What..
-
What..
"The police said the Neo-nazi's did not break any laws"
In response of a nazi rally in a US town.
Uh..
FYI, being a Neo-nazi is a crime against humanity -
What..
"The police said the Neo-nazi's did not break any laws"
In response of a nazi rally in a US town.
Uh..
FYI, being a Neo-nazi is a crime against humanity@stux but protesting in front of a Tesla dealership is *checks notes* domestic terrorism.
-
@stux but protesting in front of a Tesla dealership is *checks notes* domestic terrorism.
@haploc Or "illegally" boycotting a nazi-company..
-
@stux I didn't see any law making it a requirement to buy one.
-
@stux I didn't see any law making it a requirement to buy one.
@haploc Let them MAKE ME
-
What..
"The police said the Neo-nazi's did not break any laws"
In response of a nazi rally in a US town.
Uh..
FYI, being a Neo-nazi is a crime against humanity -
@RandamuMaki Ahaaa!
that's a dilemma indeed -
What..
"The police said the Neo-nazi's did not break any laws"
In response of a nazi rally in a US town.
Uh..
FYI, being a Neo-nazi is a crime against humanity@stux the first amendment free speech thing in America seems so culturally different than every other democracy in the world.. I'm not sure I'll ever understand it, since I didn't grow up in that culture. There seems to be an absolutist position - that every bit of speech is protected, even vile, racist, genocidal speech, so long as it doesn't pose "imminent threat" or something...
