Skip to content
0
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Sketchy)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Wandering Adventure Party

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Thank you to Steve Bannon for giving away the game:

Thank you to Steve Bannon for giving away the game:

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
49 Posts 34 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Randahl FinkR Randahl Fink

    Thank you to Steve Bannon for giving away the game:

    Step 1: Show the people that ICE can kill anybody.

    Step 2: Have ICE show up at polling stations in areas where people vote against Trump, so those neighborhoods do not go vote.

    The TurtleT This user is from outside of this forum
    The TurtleT This user is from outside of this forum
    The Turtle
    wrote last edited by
    #40

    @randahl so much invested in the idea that trump will never die.

    He's 80. He will, and soon. And then all the trumpys are fucked, because he won't leave behind a repeatable example anyone will follow, and no successor (Vance ain't it).

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • bjb :devuannew: :emacs:B bjb :devuannew: :emacs:

      @ricardoharvin @dmitry

      An election with only one allowed outcome is not an election.

      This "election" is performative, to make people think they can still vote so they will accept all these measures. If they get away with it, it will be the last one. This performative election is the last faint chance to object to fascism, that is why they are spending so much - to render any opposition to the current administraton ineffective so that resistance will fail.

      Ricardo HarvinR This user is from outside of this forum
      Ricardo HarvinR This user is from outside of this forum
      Ricardo Harvin
      wrote last edited by
      #41

      @bjb @dmitry Exactly

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • Dmitry BorodaenkoD Dmitry Borodaenko

        @ricardoharvin Bullshit. If they really didn't, they wouldn't be pouring so much money and effort into making it harder to vote.

        Ricardo HarvinR This user is from outside of this forum
        Ricardo HarvinR This user is from outside of this forum
        Ricardo Harvin
        wrote last edited by
        #42

        @dmitry *Ultimately*, they do not care because they mean to render all results moot, truth!

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • contrasocialC contrasocial

          @katrinakatrinka @randahl

          They can't do the whole country, but they don't need to, they just need to do certain districts. This is about holding on to a razor majority in congress.

          And you have to remember, states like Texas with Greg "the fucker" Abbott are going to be gleeful little helpers in making this happen.

          I don't want to demoralize people from voting, but we have to be prepared for the real possibility of it being stolen.

          Katrina Katrinka :donor:K This user is from outside of this forum
          Katrina Katrinka :donor:K This user is from outside of this forum
          Katrina Katrinka :donor:
          wrote last edited by
          #43

          @contrasocial @randahl
          Check out Texas' recent special election. The only way you get a 30 point swing is for Republicans to vote for the Democratic candidate.

          Link Preview Image
          Democrat wins special election for red Texas Senate seat

          With ballots tallied from all but a handful of voting centers, Rehmet had 57% of the vote, besting the 43% for his GOP opponent, Leigh Wambsganss, who had a massive spending advantage.

          favicon

          The Texas Tribune (www.texastribune.org)

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • Randahl FinkR Randahl Fink

            Thank you to Steve Bannon for giving away the game:

            Step 1: Show the people that ICE can kill anybody.

            Step 2: Have ICE show up at polling stations in areas where people vote against Trump, so those neighborhoods do not go vote.

            Ivey Janette McClellandI This user is from outside of this forum
            Ivey Janette McClellandI This user is from outside of this forum
            Ivey Janette McClelland
            wrote last edited by
            #44

            @randahl And turn this country back into Jim Crow mode. By banning minorities from voting.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • Randahl FinkR Randahl Fink

              Thank you to Steve Bannon for giving away the game:

              Step 1: Show the people that ICE can kill anybody.

              Step 2: Have ICE show up at polling stations in areas where people vote against Trump, so those neighborhoods do not go vote.

              M.S. Bellows, Jr.M This user is from outside of this forum
              M.S. Bellows, Jr.M This user is from outside of this forum
              M.S. Bellows, Jr.
              wrote last edited by
              #45

              @randahl

              Link Preview Image
              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • Dmitry BorodaenkoD Dmitry Borodaenko

                @ricardoharvin Bullshit. If they really didn't, they wouldn't be pouring so much money and effort into making it harder to vote.

                dragonfrogD This user is from outside of this forum
                dragonfrogD This user is from outside of this forum
                dragonfrog
                wrote last edited by
                #46

                @dmitry @ricardoharvin If they only use one tactic to undermine the whole election, then people can point to it and say "see, if they hadn't done *that* then the election would have gone differently".

                If they try ten different things, where no individual one on its own is sufficient to change the outcome, but any six would be - then any time discussion focuses on one tactic, they can deflect by saying "oh come now, any effect from that was too small to change the outcome anyway, get over it".

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • Jürgen HubertJ Jürgen Hubert

                  @randahl @energisch_

                  The USA never were a democracy, although they made a pretty convincing cosplayer some of the time.

                  C.Suthorn :prn:L This user is from outside of this forum
                  C.Suthorn :prn:L This user is from outside of this forum
                  C.Suthorn :prn:
                  wrote last edited by
                  #47
                  Jürgen Hubert Bis Trump angefangen hat RichterStellen zu besetzen, waren die USA ein Rechtsstaat. Jedenfalls für Leute mit Geld oder Krautquellding. Randahl Fink Mensch, Marina
                  Jürgen HubertJ 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • Katrina Katrinka :donor:K Katrina Katrinka :donor:

                    @randahl
                    ICE doesn't have that many people.

                    Also, Minnesota had a special election with ICE oppressing them and scaring people from going out in public. They voted in spite of it.

                    Link Preview Image
                    Minnesotans just showed they’ll ‘crawl over broken glass’ to vote, despite ICE terror

                    If Trump sends troops to disrupt voting, he could face a massive backlash

                    favicon

                    (www.the-downballot.com)

                    C.Suthorn :prn:L This user is from outside of this forum
                    C.Suthorn :prn:L This user is from outside of this forum
                    C.Suthorn :prn:
                    wrote last edited by
                    #48
                    Katrina Katrinka :donor: You don't have to influence the voters, just the elected representatives. Randahl Fink
                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • C.Suthorn :prn:L C.Suthorn :prn:
                      Jürgen Hubert Bis Trump angefangen hat RichterStellen zu besetzen, waren die USA ein Rechtsstaat. Jedenfalls für Leute mit Geld oder Krautquellding. Randahl Fink Mensch, Marina
                      Jürgen HubertJ This user is from outside of this forum
                      Jürgen HubertJ This user is from outside of this forum
                      Jürgen Hubert
                      wrote last edited by
                      #49

                      @randahl @energisch_ @Life_is

                      Aber die Fähigkeit zu wählen war nie ein Recht in den USA - nur ein Privileg.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0

                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Login or register to search.
                      Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                      • First post
                        Last post