D&D needs at least one strength-based caster, and at one fewer charisma-based caster.
-
D&D needs at least one strength-based caster, and at one fewer charisma-based caster.
Solution?
Swole warlock.
-
D&D needs at least one strength-based caster, and at one fewer charisma-based caster.
Solution?
Swole warlock.
Honestly, you should let any player play any caster class as intelligence or strength-based if they want to.
You should let your players play intelligence-based fighters and barbarians and rogues.
You should let your players play charisma-based clerics.
You should let your players play wisdom-based bards.
-
D&D needs at least one strength-based caster, and at one fewer charisma-based caster.
Solution?
Swole warlock.
@elkhome casts different spells with each flex pose.
-
Honestly, you should let any player play any caster class as intelligence or strength-based if they want to.
You should let your players play intelligence-based fighters and barbarians and rogues.
You should let your players play charisma-based clerics.
You should let your players play wisdom-based bards.
The explanation in D&D for why sorcerers are charisma-based is pretty silly.
Why does having a magic bloodline give you the ability to cast magic through the force of your personality?
Warlock does that much better. Their magic is literally negotiated.
-
P Pteryx the Puzzle Secretary shared this topic
-
@elkhome casts different spells with each flex pose.
Sablebadger All spells are just called “Iron”
