Skip to content
0
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Sketchy)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Wandering Adventure Party

  1. Home
  2. PC Gaming
  3. Rockstar co-founder [Dan Houser] compares AI to 'mad cow disease,' and says the execs pushing it aren't 'fully-rounded humans'

Rockstar co-founder [Dan Houser] compares AI to 'mad cow disease,' and says the execs pushing it aren't 'fully-rounded humans'

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved PC Gaming
pcgaming
120 Posts 54 Posters 1 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • alessandro@lemmy.caA alessandro@lemmy.ca
    This post did not contain any content.
    BeBopALouieB This user is from outside of this forum
    BeBopALouieB This user is from outside of this forum
    BeBopALouie
    wrote on last edited by
    #111

    Agreed. Moo.

    1 Reply Last reply
    5
    • 反いじめ戦隊A 反いじめ戦隊

      Cool. My argument is Dan Houser exploited employees when he worked at RGS.

      cilethesane@lemmy.caC This user is from outside of this forum
      cilethesane@lemmy.caC This user is from outside of this forum
      cilethesane@lemmy.ca
      wrote on last edited by cilethesane@lemmy.ca
      #112
      1. That’s a statement, not an argument. If you’re going to start citing fallacies then I’m going to start expecting properly formed arguments.

      2. That statement seems to be based exclusively on him being a union buster, despite the union busting happening 5 years after he left.

      反いじめ戦隊A 1 Reply Last reply
      1
      • 反いじめ戦隊A 反いじめ戦隊

        When did the formation of an union discussion started?

        cilethesane@lemmy.caC This user is from outside of this forum
        cilethesane@lemmy.caC This user is from outside of this forum
        cilethesane@lemmy.ca
        wrote on last edited by
        #113

        I don’t know, when?

        反いじめ戦隊A 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • remembertheapollo_@lemmy.worldR remembertheapollo_@lemmy.world

          Humanity and creativity are not on the CEO’s resumeé. Making shareholders happy by increasing profits and padding the CEO’s ego certainly is.

          Nik282000N This user is from outside of this forum
          Nik282000N This user is from outside of this forum
          Nik282000
          wrote on last edited by
          #114

          Making shareholders happy by increasing profits and padding the CEO’s ego Theft and corruption certainly is.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • cilethesane@lemmy.caC cilethesane@lemmy.ca
            1. That’s a statement, not an argument. If you’re going to start citing fallacies then I’m going to start expecting properly formed arguments.

            2. That statement seems to be based exclusively on him being a union buster, despite the union busting happening 5 years after he left.

            反いじめ戦隊A This user is from outside of this forum
            反いじめ戦隊A This user is from outside of this forum
            反いじめ戦隊
            wrote on last edited by
            #115

            Reread my first post.

            cilethesane@lemmy.caC 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • cilethesane@lemmy.caC cilethesane@lemmy.ca

              I don’t know, when?

              反いじめ戦隊A This user is from outside of this forum
              反いじめ戦隊A This user is from outside of this forum
              反いじめ戦隊
              wrote on last edited by
              #116

              Scroll up to the youtube video I linked.

              cilethesane@lemmy.caC 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • T totallyhuman@lemmy.ca

                You can hold a short position by repeatedly borrowing more stock – but you run the risk of running out of money completely, because short positions have (theoretically) infinite downside risk.

                M This user is from outside of this forum
                M This user is from outside of this forum
                mortn@lemmy.world
                wrote on last edited by
                #117

                Financial risks can, by themselves, never be infinite. They are by nature quite finite. Also, risks are always alluding to a downside. Otherwise they’re called chances.

                T 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • 反いじめ戦隊A 反いじめ戦隊

                  Reread my first post.

                  cilethesane@lemmy.caC This user is from outside of this forum
                  cilethesane@lemmy.caC This user is from outside of this forum
                  cilethesane@lemmy.ca
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #118

                  So he’s going to rehire the visa dependent labourers RG fired?

                  That’s neither a statement nor an argument, and is complete nonsense.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • 反いじめ戦隊A 反いじめ戦隊

                    Scroll up to the youtube video I linked.

                    cilethesane@lemmy.caC This user is from outside of this forum
                    cilethesane@lemmy.caC This user is from outside of this forum
                    cilethesane@lemmy.ca
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #119

                    tl, dw. When did the discussion start?

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • M mortn@lemmy.world

                      Financial risks can, by themselves, never be infinite. They are by nature quite finite. Also, risks are always alluding to a downside. Otherwise they’re called chances.

                      T This user is from outside of this forum
                      T This user is from outside of this forum
                      totallyhuman@lemmy.ca
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #120

                      Granted. “Arbitrarily large” would probably be a better phrasing: if I buy a stock for $100 and the value drops to $0, I’m out $100. Can’t lose more money than I put in. What I meant is that short positions, by their nature, don’t have this ceiling on the amount of money you lose.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0

                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Login or register to search.
                      Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                      • First post
                        Last post