Valve Responds To Steam Machine's HDMI 2.1 Display Support Controversy [HW support is there, but "The HDMI forum" doesn’t allow with OpenSource drivers]
-
“We need to develop a one universal standard that covers everyone’s use cases.”
-
This is the problem. I would switch to DP instantly but my TV only has HDMI ports.
There are DisplayPort to HDMI converters available
-
This post did not contain any content.
HDMI Forum Rejects Open-Source HDMI 2.1 Driver Support Sought By AMD
One of the limitations of AMD's open-source Linux graphics driver has been the inability to implement HDMI 2.1+ functionality on the basis of legal requirements by the HDMI Forum
(www.phoronix.com)
It’s pretty weird that this organization that exists only to extract rents from people who want to use hdmi remains unwilling to do so even for a customer as large as Valve. I wonder who has given them the motivation for it, and how much it cost them.
-
HDMI requires a license cost, DisplayPort is free.
What advantage does HDMI hold over DisplayPort?
Omg is this seriously it??
-
“We need to develop a one universal standard that covers everyone’s use cases.”
The use case of “make a shit ton of money licensing a proprietary standard” is kind of mutually exclusive with other use cases. It would be hard to cover.
-
At least one person got the joke.
-
There are DisplayPort to HDMI converters available
Pretty sure DRMed content refuses to play on those.
-
There are DisplayPort to HDMI converters available
Latency, desync, probably can’t do full 4k/120… just because something exists doesn’t mean it’s a viable solution.
-
No real technical advantage; it’s just owned by the same shitbags that dominate the TV market, so it’s the only way to connect to a lot of consumer living-room displays
Display port to HDMI cables are pretty good
-
Their motivation is staying away from open platforms, and protecting their members’ IP rights. Gotta thwart those pirates.
AMD is nearly 100x the size of Valve, and they couldn’t get HDMI 2.1 approval on Linux. Nvidia somewhat has it with their proprietary drivers, but not nouveau.
-
It’s wild how much we flock around such shitty standards all the time, generation after generation.
-
HDMI requires a license cost, DisplayPort is free.
What advantage does HDMI hold over DisplayPort?
My guess is TV compatibility. The steam machine is intended as a living room PC, connected to your TV. Most TVs only have HDMI, no DP.
-
Their motivation is staying away from open platforms, and protecting their members’ IP rights. Gotta thwart those pirates.
AMD is nearly 100x the size of Valve, and they couldn’t get HDMI 2.1 approval on Linux. Nvidia somewhat has it with their proprietary drivers, but not nouveau.
They’re not fucking with AMD and Valve just because they spontaneously developed an irrational hatred of partly-open platforms. Somebody has persuaded them that they have a financial incentive to do it.
-
Omg is this seriously it??
Yeah pretty much. Display port is just as good but there aren’t really a lot of TVs on the market with display port because the people who own the HDMI standard are in that industry.
-
HDMI requires a license cost, DisplayPort is free.
What advantage does HDMI hold over DisplayPort?
I don’t think you can send audio over DisplayPort
-
It’s wild how much we flock around such shitty standards all the time, generation after generation.
We don’t flock to it, they are forced upon us. Finding TVs that support DP is almost impossible.
One of the biggest problems is that shitty standards use the money they get from licensing the standard to push the standard. Good open standards often don’t have a marketing budget to play with. On top of that, shitty standards can make unrealistic promises to gain an advantage. Like HDMI does with DRM. “If every device uses this standard, piracy will be a thing of the past!”
-
“We need to develop a one universal standard that covers everyone’s use cases.”
It exists. It’s Display Port.
-
Pretty sure DRMed content refuses to play on those.
️ Well ️ I ️ don’t ️ care ️ -
HDMI requires a license cost, DisplayPort is free.
What advantage does HDMI hold over DisplayPort?
I’m not sure where I got this idea, but I thought it was because Display Port doesn’t carry audio, and a single-cable solution was more appealing.
But apparently Display Port also supports audio, just none of my devices seem to recognize it…?
Apparently the only advantage of HDMI is ARC (Audio Return Channel), allowing devices to send audio back to the video source, which might be useful in some home theater setups.
-
Display port to HDMI cables are pretty good
Active ones aren’t cheap, though.
