Skip to content
0
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Sketchy)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Wandering Adventure Party

  1. Home
  2. PC Gaming
  3. Australian anti-porn group claims responsibility for Steam's new censorship rules in victory against 'porn sick brain rotted pedo gamer fetishists', and things only get weirder from there

Australian anti-porn group claims responsibility for Steam's new censorship rules in victory against 'porn sick brain rotted pedo gamer fetishists', and things only get weirder from there

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved PC Gaming
pcgaming
164 Posts 82 Posters 4 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • F fleur_@aussie.zone

    Nothing says antifa like the commercialised exploitation of women

    ZeroOneM This user is from outside of this forum
    ZeroOneM This user is from outside of this forum
    ZeroOne
    wrote on last edited by
    #87

    What exploitation ? When the same group also plays those porn games😂

    F 1 Reply Last reply
    4
    • I inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world
      This post did not contain any content.
      S This user is from outside of this forum
      S This user is from outside of this forum
      shaggysnacks@lemmy.myserv.one
      wrote on last edited by
      #88

      Link Preview Image
      Australian Anti-Porn Group Collective Shout Escalates its War for Video Game Censorship

      Australian Anti-Porn activist group Collective Shout has mounted a pressure campaign against Steam and other platforms for hosting "explicit content".

      favicon

      GamesHub (www.gameshub.com)

      Collective Shout is a self-described feminist non-partisan organization, but has alleged ties with anti-trans and conservative organizations. The group has developed a reputation as a sort of puritan crusade that targets everything from Detroit: Become Human to Tyler, the Creator.

      This one quote tells me what kind of people Collective Shout are. First, Collective Shout will go after the low hanging fruit and then will move to LGBT themed games.

      D S 2 Replies Last reply
      47
      • ZeroOneM ZeroOne

        TERFs are evidence in itself, the fact that they exist even all these years

        squid64@lemmy.caS This user is from outside of this forum
        squid64@lemmy.caS This user is from outside of this forum
        squid64@lemmy.ca
        wrote on last edited by
        #89

        TERFs are anti-porn?

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • ZeroOneM ZeroOne

          What exploitation ? When the same group also plays those porn games😂

          F This user is from outside of this forum
          F This user is from outside of this forum
          fleur_@aussie.zone
          wrote on last edited by
          #90

          Arguing that porn doesn’t exploit women because there are women who consume porn is just as dumb as arguing that porn does exploit women because there are women who don’t consume porn.

          1 Reply Last reply
          1
          • I inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world
            This post did not contain any content.
            S This user is from outside of this forum
            S This user is from outside of this forum
            sunsofold@lemmings.world
            wrote on last edited by
            #91

            It’d be kind of funny if some rep from steam just came out and said, ‘Wait, the Aussies wanted this? Put it all back! Add on a few more new ones even. This won’t stand.’

            1 Reply Last reply
            15
            • F fleur_@aussie.zone

              I think this was a ratings issue. I think you can make video games with real life drugs in them but if you don’t want an +18 rating you’ll have to compromise. I think Bethesda got told they could only sell the game to adults and so they changed the names to make more money. I mean I was playing GTA selling real drugs and playing fallout 4 and doping on fake drugs on the same PS4 at 15, I just couldn’t walk into eb’s and buy a copy of GTA without my dad there lol.

              I’m all for creative freedoms but when it comes to selling games to kids that show real life drugs as giving sweet buffs, maybe a little subtlety is warranted.

              Anyway obligatory ragebait dum American can’t comprehend nuance comment

              S This user is from outside of this forum
              S This user is from outside of this forum
              sys110x@feddit.nl
              wrote on last edited by sys110x@feddit.nl
              #92

              Kinda correct, it was a ratings issue. The problem was that we didn’t have an 18+ rating for video games - if your game was deemed 18+ then you couldn’t sell it here. Sex, depictions of drug use, and a couple of other things I can’t remember right now are reasons for an instant 18+ rating.

              Bethesda got told they couldn’t sell it to anyone in Australia, so they compromised to drugs that didn’t actually exist.

              Left 4 Dead had something similar with the gore; if I remember correctly, L4D rating submission referred to the zombies as “monsters” (or something) and passed while L4D2 referred to the zombies as “infected people”… because they were now people, our ratings board shit the bed protected the children and gave it 18+ until they removed the bodies and gore. It was patched back in by Valve when we got an 18+ rating.

              South Park: The Stick of Truth has/had some good censored scenes about this, graphically describing Randy being probed by an alien while the graphic of a koala sits in the background. These were patched out too I think (or I downloaded a mod).

              We still have people like these lobbying against porn on Steam, but the overall situation got a lot better when we got an 18+ rating.

              F 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • S sys110x@feddit.nl

                Kinda correct, it was a ratings issue. The problem was that we didn’t have an 18+ rating for video games - if your game was deemed 18+ then you couldn’t sell it here. Sex, depictions of drug use, and a couple of other things I can’t remember right now are reasons for an instant 18+ rating.

                Bethesda got told they couldn’t sell it to anyone in Australia, so they compromised to drugs that didn’t actually exist.

                Left 4 Dead had something similar with the gore; if I remember correctly, L4D rating submission referred to the zombies as “monsters” (or something) and passed while L4D2 referred to the zombies as “infected people”… because they were now people, our ratings board shit the bed protected the children and gave it 18+ until they removed the bodies and gore. It was patched back in by Valve when we got an 18+ rating.

                South Park: The Stick of Truth has/had some good censored scenes about this, graphically describing Randy being probed by an alien while the graphic of a koala sits in the background. These were patched out too I think (or I downloaded a mod).

                We still have people like these lobbying against porn on Steam, but the overall situation got a lot better when we got an 18+ rating.

                F This user is from outside of this forum
                F This user is from outside of this forum
                fleur_@aussie.zone
                wrote on last edited by
                #93

                The first Australian +18 video game was released in January 2013, GTA 5 came out in December 2013 and fallout 4 was released in November… 2015

                From what I can tell from the timeline of events it absolutely was a move by Bethesda to market the game to kids.

                S 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • R ryannathans@aussie.zone

                  As an Australian this is accurate, remember it is illegal here to share nude photos or porn if the woman has small breasts! Because protect the children

                  F This user is from outside of this forum
                  F This user is from outside of this forum
                  fleur_@aussie.zone
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #94

                  Has anyone been convicted of this?

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  1
                  • E erac@lemmings.world

                    Targeting payment processors to force change within a business often leads to overreaction. That’s how we got Onlyfans announcing that it was banning porn entirely. Visa, MasterCard, and PayPal become quite unreasonable when these groups start gaining traction.

                    This same group pushed to get Detroit: Become Human pulled because it has the player controlling a victim of abuse protecting another victim. There is zero nuance to their target choices. If they get pull with payment processors, they can go “this is a child abuse simulator!” and get something like that pulled with less public support behind them.

                    GloomyG This user is from outside of this forum
                    GloomyG This user is from outside of this forum
                    Gloomy
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #95

                    There is zero nuance to their target choices.

                    Zero nuance is what this thread is filled with.

                    One does not need to agree with everything they do or did. In fact, i don’t. But getting games that are clearly catering to rapist fantasies pulled off steam, is something i see as very positive.

                    dandelion (she/her)D 1 Reply Last reply
                    1
                    • F fleur_@aussie.zone

                      The first Australian +18 video game was released in January 2013, GTA 5 came out in December 2013 and fallout 4 was released in November… 2015

                      From what I can tell from the timeline of events it absolutely was a move by Bethesda to market the game to kids.

                      S This user is from outside of this forum
                      S This user is from outside of this forum
                      sys110x@feddit.nl
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #96

                      The name changes go back to Fallout 3 (at least, I can’t recall if FO1 & FO2 had the same drama).

                      By the time of Fallout 4, names like Med-X (morphine), Rad-Away (iodine), Brawno (amphetamine? I can’t remember) were well and truly bedded in, and suited the aesthetic. Why change it at that point? They’ve created names that suit the aesthetic better than the actual drug names.

                      I was in my mid/late 20s when this was all going down. I grey imported the MK reboot so I could play, had a copy of Manhunt, and others. The Fallout drug names were a result of the lack of 18+ rating and trying to comply with MA15.

                      Link Preview Image
                      Fallout 3 can’t get a rating in Australia

                      Australia's OLFC ratings board has refused to give Fallout 3 a rating, meaning …

                      favicon

                      Ars Technica (arstechnica.com)

                      Link Preview Image
                      Fallout continues from ban on game

                      favicon

                      The Sydney Morning Herald (www.smh.com.au)

                      Link Preview Image
                      Why Australian classification law is so tough on video games

                      Australian classification law is tough on video games, with harsh restrictions on content. At SXSW Sydney 2024, an expert panel discussed why.

                      favicon

                      GamesHub (www.gameshub.com)

                      F 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • 𝙲𝚑𝚊𝚒𝚛𝚖𝚊𝚗 𝙼𝚎𝚘𝚠C 𝙲𝚑𝚊𝚒𝚛𝚖𝚊𝚗 𝙼𝚎𝚘𝚠

                        “Porn” is extremely broad. There’s plenty of perfectly ethical porn around. Most major producers have pretty strong standards these days. It’s not the same industry as it was 10 years ago.

                        But in this specific case they went after a porn game, not featuring real people. There’s basically no real harm here. People occasionally argue that porn addiction is a problem, but that’s mostly an addiction problem, which goes for most addictions. The thing addicted too isn’t the problem, it’s the very nature of being addicted that’s causing the issue.

                        It’s fine of course to dislike porn, but to effectively ban people from producing and consuming it is an entirely different matter. That does seem like a massive encroachment on individual rights to me.

                        GloomyG This user is from outside of this forum
                        GloomyG This user is from outside of this forum
                        Gloomy
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #97

                        But in this specific case they went after a porn game, not featuring real people. There’s basically no real harm here.

                        Just to make sure, this is the game you are defending and think there is no harm to people being exposed or reinforcing this view of women:

                        In this game, you’ll either become every woman’s worst nightmare… or rather: the best dick they’ll ever have. Your goal is simple: leave no pussy non-fucked, since that’s the only thing they all want. Never take ‘no’ for an answer.

                        Fuck your mom, fuck your auntie, and even fuck your friend’s mom. Why not?

                        Take what’s yours and show No Mercy.

                        Could you please be realy clear: You don’t see any problem with this?

                        𝙲𝚑𝚊𝚒𝚛𝚖𝚊𝚗 𝙼𝚎𝚘𝚠C 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • S sys110x@feddit.nl

                          The name changes go back to Fallout 3 (at least, I can’t recall if FO1 & FO2 had the same drama).

                          By the time of Fallout 4, names like Med-X (morphine), Rad-Away (iodine), Brawno (amphetamine? I can’t remember) were well and truly bedded in, and suited the aesthetic. Why change it at that point? They’ve created names that suit the aesthetic better than the actual drug names.

                          I was in my mid/late 20s when this was all going down. I grey imported the MK reboot so I could play, had a copy of Manhunt, and others. The Fallout drug names were a result of the lack of 18+ rating and trying to comply with MA15.

                          Link Preview Image
                          Fallout 3 can’t get a rating in Australia

                          Australia's OLFC ratings board has refused to give Fallout 3 a rating, meaning …

                          favicon

                          Ars Technica (arstechnica.com)

                          Link Preview Image
                          Fallout continues from ban on game

                          favicon

                          The Sydney Morning Herald (www.smh.com.au)

                          Link Preview Image
                          Why Australian classification law is so tough on video games

                          Australian classification law is tough on video games, with harsh restrictions on content. At SXSW Sydney 2024, an expert panel discussed why.

                          favicon

                          GamesHub (www.gameshub.com)

                          F This user is from outside of this forum
                          F This user is from outside of this forum
                          fleur_@aussie.zone
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #98

                          Ah yeah true dat

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • ZeroOneM ZeroOne

                            Feminists are TERFs & homophobes PERIOD, the ones that aren’t are in hiding.

                            GloomyG This user is from outside of this forum
                            GloomyG This user is from outside of this forum
                            Gloomy
                            wrote on last edited by gloomy@mander.xyz
                            #99

                            I study at a quite left university. Several of my lectures are about or at least cover some feminist theories. There are a lot of outspoken feminist people here, as well as quite a few queer folk. I have yet to meet a single homophobic or terf feminist.

                            ZeroOneM 1 Reply Last reply
                            3
                            • GloomyG Gloomy

                              There is zero nuance to their target choices.

                              Zero nuance is what this thread is filled with.

                              One does not need to agree with everything they do or did. In fact, i don’t. But getting games that are clearly catering to rapist fantasies pulled off steam, is something i see as very positive.

                              dandelion (she/her)D This user is from outside of this forum
                              dandelion (she/her)D This user is from outside of this forum
                              dandelion (she/her)
                              wrote on last edited by dandelion@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                              #100

                              not sure anyone thinks the problem here is that these particular games are getting taken down, the larger context and efforts of this group are concerning as it etablishes precedent for them to take the next step in their anti-trans and anti-gay agenda …

                              GloomyG 1 Reply Last reply
                              5
                              • F Fluffy Kitty Cat

                                Porn addiction isn’t even real, Christians made it up to shame people

                                GloomyG This user is from outside of this forum
                                GloomyG This user is from outside of this forum
                                Gloomy
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #101

                                This is not correct.

                                Contrary to the earlier notion that addiction is predominantly a substance dependency, research now suggests that any source or experience capable of stimulating an individual has addictive potential. This has led to a paradigm shift in the psychiatric understanding of behavioural addictions. These can refer to a range of behaviors such as gambling, video gaming, and sexual practices. Hypersexual behavior and pornography addiction come to the fore when the behavior becomes intensive, out of the individual’s control, and persists in that pattern despite harmful consequences and risk of harm to one’s emotional and/or physical health.

                                Just a moment...

                                favicon

                                (journals.sagepub.com)

                                F 1 Reply Last reply
                                1
                                • BlackLaZoRB BlackLaZoR

                                  This is we can’t have nice things.

                                  GloomyG This user is from outside of this forum
                                  GloomyG This user is from outside of this forum
                                  Gloomy
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #102

                                  Nice things like games involving incest and rape?

                                  BlackLaZoRB 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • S some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org

                                    “Australian anti-porn group has too much power.”

                                    D This user is from outside of this forum
                                    D This user is from outside of this forum
                                    duamerthrax@lemmy.world
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #103

                                    Always has.

                                    Link Preview Image
                                    Australia's 'small breast' ban

                                    Australia has vowed to fight child exploitation — but is stamping out images of "small-breasted" women really the right way to do it?

                                    favicon

                                    The Week (theweek.com)

                                    P S 2 Replies Last reply
                                    10
                                    • GloomyG Gloomy

                                      I had a look at their website.

                                      They have campaigned against games that normalize incest and sexual abuse. The first campaign, that led to this one, was against a game called No mercy.

                                      The description, according to their website, is:

                                      In this game, you’ll either become every woman’s worst nightmare… or rather: the best dick they’ll ever have. Your goal is simple: leave no pussy non-fucked, since that’s the only thing they all want. Never take ‘no’ for an answer.

                                      Fuck your mom, fuck your auntie, and even fuck your friend’s mom. Why not?

                                      Take what’s yours and show No Mercy.

                                      Following that they campaigned against other games promoting sexual violence and incest.

                                      Following our successful campaign and 70k petition to get rape simulation game No Mercy pulled from gaming platform Steam, we discovered almost 500 other games depicting rape, incest, sexual torture and child abuse.

                                      How is this a bad thing? Do you lot just hear anti-porn and start foaming around your mouth?

                                      D This user is from outside of this forum
                                      D This user is from outside of this forum
                                      duamerthrax@lemmy.world
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #104

                                      Do you have trouble differentiating between fiction and reality?

                                      Can I demand racing games be banned because they promote CO2 emissions?

                                      GloomyG 1 Reply Last reply
                                      4
                                      • R redwattlebird@lemmings.world

                                        Alright, time to research and rat these idiots out. The fact that they tried to ban Detroit: Become Human is enough for me to know that they’re not gamers at all and are just cookers.

                                        R This user is from outside of this forum
                                        R This user is from outside of this forum
                                        redwattlebird@lemmings.world
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #105

                                        I’m trying to follow the money and can’t find much but there are very strong ties to the Christian/Baptist community, which means that there is an above 0% chance that Advance Australia has or is providing funding.

                                        Their partners and partner’s partners are anti-sex (such as CATWA who believe that all prostitution is not a job but is a form of sex trafficking and appears to be against the sex industry), anti-abortion, and all board members and their associated partners are very painfully white.

                                        There’s also an association with the NCJWA, whose president appears to be pro Zionist and has lauded Jillian Segal as a voice of moral clarity (anti-semetic envoy for government pushing to reduce protest rights, husband made a $50k donation to Advance Australia).

                                        Hilariously, one of their partners is called ‘Campaign Against Sex Robots’.

                                        Anyway, in summary, this appears to be a very well funded right wing puritan religious group whose only games experiences are in the political realm rather than PC.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        4
                                        • L lumisal@lemmy.world

                                          So many of them end up doing this kind of thing because they need money and stuff and never wanted to do it in the first place.

                                          You just described most people doing most jobs.

                                          Pretty sure most people wouldn’t work in whatever job they have if they didn’t need the money.

                                          Likewise, there’s many who likely prefer doing porn over working in fast food or retail. After all, in one you get demeaned, mistreated, even abused, and in the other you get to orgasm for money.

                                          Also if you really think women undressing and doing porn for the pleasure of the men

                                          Way to just say that women and LGBT+ don’t like porn.

                                          Says a lot more about you than anything else you’ve said, bigot.

                                          PS: when the correlation is extremely strong and repeatable, it usually implies causation. There’s already research that proves that link isn’t just correlation. Not that it seems you’re actually interested in data or good faith discussion.

                                          GloomyG This user is from outside of this forum
                                          GloomyG This user is from outside of this forum
                                          Gloomy
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #106

                                          You just described most people doing most jobs.

                                          If your job is honestly comparable to that of a reluctant sex worker, you really need to switch jobs.

                                          Pretty sure most people wouldn’t work in whatever job they have if they didn’t need the money.

                                          Likewise, there’s many who likely prefer doing porn over working in fast food or retail. After all, in one you get demeaned, mistreated, even abused, and in the other you get to orgasm for money.

                                          This is a completly wrong conceptualization. Porn “stars” often are often locked into filming increasingly extreme and often increasingly violent content. Many are left back traumatized for life.

                                          See, for example, this study.

                                          This article challenges the consumer-centric view of pornography, which overlooks the exploitation and abuse of individuals documented in its production. The lack of conceptual clarity surrounding the nature of pornography obscures these abuses, leading to significant consequences for those affecte

                                          Way to just say that women and LGBT+ don’t like porn.

                                          About 70% of consumers are men.

                                          when the correlation is extremely strong and repeatable, it usually implies causation. There’s already research that proves that link isn’t just correlation. Not that it seems you’re actually interested in data or good faith discussion.

                                          Op might or might not be, but i am. Please feel free to back up your claim with data.

                                          L 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0

                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          • First post
                                            Last post