Skip to content
0
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Sketchy)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Wandering Adventure Party

  1. Home
  2. Canada
  3. Canada finally reveals the results of its universal basic income experiment

Canada finally reveals the results of its universal basic income experiment

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Canada
177 Posts 72 Posters 120 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • S stray@pawb.social

    Controlled rent is better than uncontrolled rent, but it suffers from the same problems as minimum wage. And why should landlords even exist? I’m not convinced private rentals should be legal at all. If you’re not using a property for personal use or a place of business, why shouldn’t it be seized and auctioned or rented publicly?

    S This user is from outside of this forum
    S This user is from outside of this forum
    soup@lemmy.world
    wrote on last edited by
    #116

    Rentals do have their place for people like students, and some businesses who regularly send employees to a city(rare but it happens). Rentals are not inherently bad, but the expectation that someone should rent as a longterm plan is completely fucked. We do not need this many many rental units in the world, not at all.

    S 1 Reply Last reply
    3
    • A arkouda@lemmy.ca

      The US spends $880 billion on military spending in 2023. That’s 20% of its annual budget. Source

      The US has roughly 350 million inhabitants. Divide that and get that you could give $2.5K annually to each person as handouts. And we’re not even talking about tax reforms here.

      Three points.

      1. This is about Canada.

      2. From my earlier post: “UBI isn’t the best solution out there, it is a highly polarized idea, and funding for a program on scale would cost Billions, requiring trillions in revenue to be a viable option.”

      3. You just paid for 1 month of UBI cutting the entire military budget for a year, which took 20% of the annual budget, leaving another 4 months of payment before the country has no budget left.

      D This user is from outside of this forum
      D This user is from outside of this forum
      Log in | Sign up
      wrote on last edited by
      #117

      You keep pretending all over this thread that you would be increasing the income of everyone. You’re ignoring completely that you change the tax system so that wealthy people pay more than at present so it’s not inventing money, it’s redistributing it. You also cancel a bunch of social security programs that it replaces.

      Your sums are based on false assumptions and you’re just spreading your FUD which is itself based on ignorance and fear. Stop trying to sound like you know something about it when you keep multiplying the population by the payment as if that was relevant in isolation of everything else that’s part of UBI.

      If you want to sound knowledgeable, first so the reading work of learning.

      But I think you don’t want to learn you just want to criticise because you don’t like the idea of money going from rich to poor.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • F fjdybank@lemmy.ca

        Why don’t you stop and smell the roses?

        Jumping to such a conclusion, then blaming the hypothetical reaction, displays ignorance or malice.

        kairubyte@lemmy.dbzer0.comK This user is from outside of this forum
        kairubyte@lemmy.dbzer0.comK This user is from outside of this forum
        kairubyte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        wrote on last edited by
        #118

        I’m pretty sure they meant that “the result they want” (“UBI is bad”) would be peer reviewed and shown to be bunk, but the people who wanted that result will ignore the peer review results.

        They weren’t disagreeing with the original comment, just adding to it.

        F B 2 Replies Last reply
        16
        • gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.deG gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de

          yes, why not?

          A This user is from outside of this forum
          A This user is from outside of this forum
          arkouda@lemmy.ca
          wrote on last edited by
          #119

          Because someone with Billions doesn’t need $300 a month that could go to funding social services for people who need them.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • kairubyte@lemmy.dbzer0.comK kairubyte@lemmy.dbzer0.com

            I’m pretty sure they meant that “the result they want” (“UBI is bad”) would be peer reviewed and shown to be bunk, but the people who wanted that result will ignore the peer review results.

            They weren’t disagreeing with the original comment, just adding to it.

            F This user is from outside of this forum
            F This user is from outside of this forum
            fjdybank@lemmy.ca
            wrote on last edited by
            #120

            If so, then my reaction was ignorant and I retract it 🙂

            B S 2 Replies Last reply
            6
            • mintiefreshM mintiefresh
              This post did not contain any content.
              J This user is from outside of this forum
              J This user is from outside of this forum
              jsomae@lemmy.ml
              wrote on last edited by
              #121

              I would rather see socialized housing, food, and (better) medical coverage than UBI. UBI could (maybe) cause the prices of essentials like housing to increase.

              P 2 Replies Last reply
              10
              • mintiefreshM mintiefresh
                This post did not contain any content.
                rivalarrival@lemmy.todayR This user is from outside of this forum
                rivalarrival@lemmy.todayR This user is from outside of this forum
                rivalarrival@lemmy.today
                wrote on last edited by
                #122

                For every dollar a participant earns through employment they lose 50 cents from their basic income payment. This means the basic income proposal would only apply to individuals earning less than 34,000 CAD ($24,380) a year, or couples earning less than 48,000 CAD ($34,420).

                This is not UBI.

                UNIVERSAL basic income is UNIVERSAL: It doesn’t matter how much you earn.

                Oh, you pulled in a billion dollars last year? Here’s your check for $12,000. To save us postage, we’re including it in the same envelope as your $450,000,000 tax bill.

                The universality of the system is the single most important component. We convey to our government(s) our political authority. They use our political authority to provide essential services, such as roads and courts and rule of law. They charge the taxpayer for those services. UBI is how they compensate us, the shareholders of our government(s) for the use of the political authority we grant them.

                UBI is not a social program. It is not charity. It is the government finally paying out dividends to its citizen-shareholders.

                1 Reply Last reply
                30
                • C CanadaRocks

                  Who said anything about ‘fuck you I got mine?’

                  First of all Canada already has a TON of social supports for anyone who is in need. We have Employment Insurance if you lose your job. We have Old Age Security and Canada Pension Plan for seniors. We have Child Tax Credits for parents and especially single parents. We have the GST credit to give back taxes to low income earners. We have the Canada Workers Benefit. We have the Canada Disability Benefit. We have the Assured Income for Severely Handicapped. We have disability pensions. We have Universal Pharmacare for prescription drugs. We have housing benefits/social housing programs. We have the Canadian Dental Benefit. We have student aid. There are free food banks in every city. And there are emergency funds available for things like rent/damage deposits on an emergency basis from every province through various community agencies, charities, and non-profit organizations.

                  So WHY do we need UBI on top of all that? If you need help in Canada, you CAN find it. Its already here.

                  Source: I founded a charity for street kids in one of our major cities thats been operating for 33 years. There is a TON of support out there. The fact is that a LOT of the people on the street know how to use and abuse the system and they dont WANT to get out of it because its what they grew up in and what they are accustomed to. I speak from years of experience.

                  rivalarrival@lemmy.todayR This user is from outside of this forum
                  rivalarrival@lemmy.todayR This user is from outside of this forum
                  rivalarrival@lemmy.today
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #123

                  Democracy is the idea that government receives its power and authority from the general public, not a king, god, or other source. The government utilizes the political authority that we provide them to perform a wide variety of essential services to its taxpayer customers.

                  We invest our political authority in the government. The political authority is what allows the government to provide and charge for those services. We are investors; shareholders. We are owed a return on our investment.

                  UBI is the dividend owed to us for our investment.

                  Those various charitable programs and services you described? Most of those would be replaced by UBI.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  1
                  • C cyborganism

                    It’s a crime to not have universal basic income at this point. People aren’t only unable to afford basic living expenses, but they’re losing jobs to automation and AI already. What are these people supposed to do? Go beg on the streets?

                    L This user is from outside of this forum
                    L This user is from outside of this forum
                    lovecanada@lemmy.ca
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #124

                    No, they’re supposed to adapt and overcome. Just like any other time in history when things are tougher. And if you think this is a tough time you havent studied our history well. The Dirty 30’s, the Great Depressions, the first and second World Wars, even the Cold War Era was much more difficult. This doesnt even compare.

                    S I K 3 Replies Last reply
                    1
                    • S stray@pawb.social

                      Controlled rent is better than uncontrolled rent, but it suffers from the same problems as minimum wage. And why should landlords even exist? I’m not convinced private rentals should be legal at all. If you’re not using a property for personal use or a place of business, why shouldn’t it be seized and auctioned or rented publicly?

                      L This user is from outside of this forum
                      L This user is from outside of this forum
                      lovecanada@lemmy.ca
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #125

                      Why should you own anything privately? You dont need two cars, one should be seized and auctioned publicly so someone else could have a car right? Why are you hoarding them?

                      Because we live in a capitalist society thats why. There are countries that do what youre proposing but they are much weaker economically and people dont have nearly the rights they do in Canada.

                      And of all the places to rent, guess who provides the most reasonable places to rent in the country? Is is Blackrock? No. Is it a consortium of investors? No. Is it a commercial landlord in your city? No. Its ALWAYS the mom and pop landlords who rent out basement suites and houses. Get rid of them and rent averages go UP.

                      S S C 3 Replies Last reply
                      2
                      • kairubyte@lemmy.dbzer0.comK kairubyte@lemmy.dbzer0.com

                        I’m pretty sure they meant that “the result they want” (“UBI is bad”) would be peer reviewed and shown to be bunk, but the people who wanted that result will ignore the peer review results.

                        They weren’t disagreeing with the original comment, just adding to it.

                        B This user is from outside of this forum
                        B This user is from outside of this forum
                        brickhead92@lemmy.world
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #126

                        You are correct, this is what I was going for.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        6
                        • F fjdybank@lemmy.ca

                          If so, then my reaction was ignorant and I retract it 🙂

                          B This user is from outside of this forum
                          B This user is from outside of this forum
                          brickhead92@lemmy.world
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #127

                          I probably should have made it more clear that that is what I was going for.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          5
                          • L lovecanada@lemmy.ca

                            No, they’re supposed to adapt and overcome. Just like any other time in history when things are tougher. And if you think this is a tough time you havent studied our history well. The Dirty 30’s, the Great Depressions, the first and second World Wars, even the Cold War Era was much more difficult. This doesnt even compare.

                            S This user is from outside of this forum
                            S This user is from outside of this forum
                            saleh@feddit.org
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #128

                            That is false. As a lesson learned from the Great Depression and the Second World war most countries made sure to have good social protection and wealth was relatively well distributed through good paying manufacturing jobs. People had access to opportunities in the form of free or cheap education and simple wealth through owning a house or apartment was accessible to a large portion of society.

                            Then Neoliberalism came up in the 80s to destroy this.

                            P L 2 Replies Last reply
                            11
                            • J jsomae@lemmy.ml

                              I would rather see socialized housing, food, and (better) medical coverage than UBI. UBI could (maybe) cause the prices of essentials like housing to increase.

                              P This user is from outside of this forum
                              P This user is from outside of this forum
                              plyth@feddit.org
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #129

                              A surplus in the housing market is needed.

                              M 1 Reply Last reply
                              2
                              • S saleh@feddit.org

                                That is false. As a lesson learned from the Great Depression and the Second World war most countries made sure to have good social protection and wealth was relatively well distributed through good paying manufacturing jobs. People had access to opportunities in the form of free or cheap education and simple wealth through owning a house or apartment was accessible to a large portion of society.

                                Then Neoliberalism came up in the 80s to destroy this.

                                P This user is from outside of this forum
                                P This user is from outside of this forum
                                plyth@feddit.org
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #130

                                Free education was a tool to move most of the intelligent workers into white collar roles. Neoliberalism was possible because too few intelligent people were left to organize an opposition.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                2
                                • J jsomae@lemmy.ml

                                  I would rather see socialized housing, food, and (better) medical coverage than UBI. UBI could (maybe) cause the prices of essentials like housing to increase.

                                  P This user is from outside of this forum
                                  P This user is from outside of this forum
                                  plyth@feddit.org
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #131

                                  Thinking about it, UBI will drive the prices of housing down because people don’t have to live where work is available. Companies have to offer cheap housing or people will live elsewhere.

                                  J 1 Reply Last reply
                                  6
                                  • L lovecanada@lemmy.ca

                                    No, they’re supposed to adapt and overcome. Just like any other time in history when things are tougher. And if you think this is a tough time you havent studied our history well. The Dirty 30’s, the Great Depressions, the first and second World Wars, even the Cold War Era was much more difficult. This doesnt even compare.

                                    I This user is from outside of this forum
                                    I This user is from outside of this forum
                                    iamnorrealtakeyourmeds@lemmy.world
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #132

                                    hi Thomas Robert Malthus, are you planning another genocide?

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    3
                                    • L lovecanada@lemmy.ca

                                      No, they’re supposed to adapt and overcome. Just like any other time in history when things are tougher. And if you think this is a tough time you havent studied our history well. The Dirty 30’s, the Great Depressions, the first and second World Wars, even the Cold War Era was much more difficult. This doesnt even compare.

                                      K This user is from outside of this forum
                                      K This user is from outside of this forum
                                      kinsnik@lemmy.world
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #133

                                      The difference between now and the past is that our current world already produces enough of everything to be post-scarcity.

                                      We produce enough food for 10+ billion people, so anyone going hungry anywhere is a policy failure. We have technology and materials to give everyone shelter, so anyone being homeless is a policy failure. We produce so much disposable clothes and electronics devices and other stuff that it is literally thrown away unsold in the desert.

                                      There is absolutely no reason for people to have to toughen up, just to have access to basic human necessities.

                                      S L 2 Replies Last reply
                                      6
                                      • P plyth@feddit.org

                                        A surplus in the housing market is needed.

                                        M This user is from outside of this forum
                                        M This user is from outside of this forum
                                        maeve@midwest.social
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #134

                                        There is, but corporations and Airbnb who hoard resources seem to too often elude in these discussions.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        3
                                        • F fjdybank@lemmy.ca

                                          If so, then my reaction was ignorant and I retract it 🙂

                                          S This user is from outside of this forum
                                          S This user is from outside of this forum
                                          systemglitch@lemmy.world
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #135

                                          I can see why the mistake was made.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0

                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          • First post
                                            Last post