Skip to content
0
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Sketchy)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Wandering Adventure Party

  1. Home
  2. Canada
  3. The Conservative floor crosser actually reveals a lot about the Liberal budget (and it's not pretty)

The Conservative floor crosser actually reveals a lot about the Liberal budget (and it's not pretty)

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Canada
canada
85 Posts 26 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • C This user is from outside of this forum
    C This user is from outside of this forum
    Cyborganism
    wrote last edited by
    #49

    In any case. We did the NDP dirty. They didn’t deserve to lose so many seats. People didn’t give Jagmeet the credit he was due. People were affraid of Trump and thought an establishment bean counter was going to save them.

    Also, can you imagine the meltdown that Trump would’ve had if he had to deal with a Sikh prime minister? He’s already freaking out over a muslim mayor in New York.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • J jack_burton@lemmy.ca

      Better? Yes. An option? Unfortunately no, not this election.

      C This user is from outside of this forum
      C This user is from outside of this forum
      Cyborganism
      wrote last edited by
      #50

      Think about it. Singh gets elected as prime minster, even with a NDP minority. Imagine the meltdown Trump would have over this. I think this would have forced Canada to make deals with other nations and quickly closed our relationship with the fascist regime down south. We also wouldn’t have had sent weapons, vehicles and parts to Israel because he was a defender of the Palestinian cause and against the genocide. This would have rocked the political world for the best in my opinion.

      J 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • S soup@lemmy.world

        Still not an excuse. They were on the ballot, and all we’re doing is kicking the can down the road. The race was way too tight already, next election is going to be rough and the only people we’ll have to defend us are the fucking Liberals.

        Vote for the party platform that most closely aligns with your values or don’t show up at all. A vote cast against yourself weakens your representation and strengthens those who don’t give a shit about you after they’ve ripped off your vote.

        J This user is from outside of this forum
        J This user is from outside of this forum
        jack_burton@lemmy.ca
        wrote last edited by
        #51

        There were polls suggesting a Conservative super majority. For many NDP voters the risk was just too great. There was a time not long before the election that had the Libs polling so low, and the Cons polling so high even if the NDP kept their seats the Cons would still win majority.

        I agree we should vote for the platform we most closely align with, but that said, this election was not a normal one. The US had just broken trade deals and started a trade war while talking annexation. For many, our sovereignty was at stake, and the NDP had no chance of saving us from that.

        S 1 Reply Last reply
        1
        • C Cyborganism

          Think about it. Singh gets elected as prime minster, even with a NDP minority. Imagine the meltdown Trump would have over this. I think this would have forced Canada to make deals with other nations and quickly closed our relationship with the fascist regime down south. We also wouldn’t have had sent weapons, vehicles and parts to Israel because he was a defender of the Palestinian cause and against the genocide. This would have rocked the political world for the best in my opinion.

          J This user is from outside of this forum
          J This user is from outside of this forum
          jack_burton@lemmy.ca
          wrote last edited by
          #52

          I’d love the dream too, but it just wasn’t there this time. I’m curious how things would have gone if fascism hadn’t taken root, but it did, and it changed the game for this election.

          1 Reply Last reply
          1
          • S soup@lemmy.world

            The NDP were right there.

            Z This user is from outside of this forum
            Z This user is from outside of this forum
            zipzoopaboop@lemmynsfw.com
            wrote last edited by
            #53

            I voted for them in a historically ndp riding. Now have a liberal representative who lives half an hour away

            1 Reply Last reply
            1
            • J jack_burton@lemmy.ca

              There were polls suggesting a Conservative super majority. For many NDP voters the risk was just too great. There was a time not long before the election that had the Libs polling so low, and the Cons polling so high even if the NDP kept their seats the Cons would still win majority.

              I agree we should vote for the platform we most closely align with, but that said, this election was not a normal one. The US had just broken trade deals and started a trade war while talking annexation. For many, our sovereignty was at stake, and the NDP had no chance of saving us from that.

              S This user is from outside of this forum
              S This user is from outside of this forum
              soup@lemmy.world
              wrote last edited by
              #54

              That’s the same lame excuse every single election. I remember in 2019 when the only ads I ever saw from the Liberals were about how we had to unite against the Conservatives and I remember last week when the same shit was going on in the Montréal municipal elections. It happens all the time and the excuse isn’t worth dirt.

              I’m sick and fucking tired of it. If you can’t use your vote responsibly don’t cast it. I would like people to use their power to vote and we know that anyone who says they’re “strategically” voting is well aware of the poison they’re putting in the system and that they know whonthey would otherwise vote for. If they actually deserved to use the word “strategy” they’d know that some things take time and letting another party steal your vote is just reactionary panic and has nothing to do with anything intelligent.

              Your vote is your only real voice. If you aren’t going to say what you mean and mean what you say then shut the hell up.

              J 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • S This user is from outside of this forum
                S This user is from outside of this forum
                soup@lemmy.world
                wrote last edited by
                #55

                Not anymore. Because we shot them in the face and spat on them after the fact so we get rat-fucked by slightly less dangerous conservatives pretending to be centrists and who are only called the woke left by the far-right because those people have a single, weak braincell between all of them. Congrats, everyone, we’re stupid.

                I did watch the video. Yes, people think they’re smart and will vote against themselves because they look at past elections and not at the one they’re actually voting on. Thanks for proving my point that “strategic voting” is stupid as hell and corrupts the system.

                FaceDeerF 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • S soup@lemmy.world

                  Not anymore. Because we shot them in the face and spat on them after the fact so we get rat-fucked by slightly less dangerous conservatives pretending to be centrists and who are only called the woke left by the far-right because those people have a single, weak braincell between all of them. Congrats, everyone, we’re stupid.

                  I did watch the video. Yes, people think they’re smart and will vote against themselves because they look at past elections and not at the one they’re actually voting on. Thanks for proving my point that “strategic voting” is stupid as hell and corrupts the system.

                  FaceDeerF This user is from outside of this forum
                  FaceDeerF This user is from outside of this forum
                  FaceDeer
                  wrote last edited by
                  #56

                  There are well-documented instances of this. Republicans supported the Green Party in the 2024 American elections, for example, providing them with legal and consulting aid. Same with independent candidate Cornel Green. This technique relies on people not voting strategically.

                  I’m sure the Conservative party would have been very happy if the NDP had siphoned some additional votes away from the Liberals in tightly contested ridings.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  1
                  • S soup@lemmy.world

                    That’s the same lame excuse every single election. I remember in 2019 when the only ads I ever saw from the Liberals were about how we had to unite against the Conservatives and I remember last week when the same shit was going on in the Montréal municipal elections. It happens all the time and the excuse isn’t worth dirt.

                    I’m sick and fucking tired of it. If you can’t use your vote responsibly don’t cast it. I would like people to use their power to vote and we know that anyone who says they’re “strategically” voting is well aware of the poison they’re putting in the system and that they know whonthey would otherwise vote for. If they actually deserved to use the word “strategy” they’d know that some things take time and letting another party steal your vote is just reactionary panic and has nothing to do with anything intelligent.

                    Your vote is your only real voice. If you aren’t going to say what you mean and mean what you say then shut the hell up.

                    J This user is from outside of this forum
                    J This user is from outside of this forum
                    jack_burton@lemmy.ca
                    wrote last edited by
                    #57

                    I understand where you’re coming from but this election did not use the same excuse, or I guess it did but this was the only time it’s really been valid. We were just threatened with annexation by our former ally, the most powerful country on the planet. We’ve never had an election with this much at stake, and voting NDP was literally risking losing our country to the US.

                    The wolves were quite literally at the gate. We could vote to open it (cons), keep it closed (libs), or work on getting rid of the wolves (ndp). NDP is clearly the best choice in this scenario, but you know full well they’d never get enough support to win, and if too many of us tried, the Cons would win and open the gate.

                    We need an election where Canadians take a BIG swing for chance to get out of the abusive 2 party cycle we’re in. This was not that election. I’m not arguing that Canadians are completely screwing ourselves every election, we absolutely are. What I am saying though, is given the circumstance voting Lib in the last election was the smart play. The smart play doesn’t always mean good.

                    Unfortunately, the NDP just weren’t an option this time. If I can’t pay my rent I have options. 1 - get a job/pick up hours at the job I have/get a second job. 2 - Sell things I own to get enough money. 3 - become rich. Although 3 is technically an option in that it is a possibility, the fact that it ain’t gonna happen right now removes it as one. Although all 3 could be possible, for rent this month only 1 and 2 are really options.

                    S 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • J jack_burton@lemmy.ca

                      I understand where you’re coming from but this election did not use the same excuse, or I guess it did but this was the only time it’s really been valid. We were just threatened with annexation by our former ally, the most powerful country on the planet. We’ve never had an election with this much at stake, and voting NDP was literally risking losing our country to the US.

                      The wolves were quite literally at the gate. We could vote to open it (cons), keep it closed (libs), or work on getting rid of the wolves (ndp). NDP is clearly the best choice in this scenario, but you know full well they’d never get enough support to win, and if too many of us tried, the Cons would win and open the gate.

                      We need an election where Canadians take a BIG swing for chance to get out of the abusive 2 party cycle we’re in. This was not that election. I’m not arguing that Canadians are completely screwing ourselves every election, we absolutely are. What I am saying though, is given the circumstance voting Lib in the last election was the smart play. The smart play doesn’t always mean good.

                      Unfortunately, the NDP just weren’t an option this time. If I can’t pay my rent I have options. 1 - get a job/pick up hours at the job I have/get a second job. 2 - Sell things I own to get enough money. 3 - become rich. Although 3 is technically an option in that it is a possibility, the fact that it ain’t gonna happen right now removes it as one. Although all 3 could be possible, for rent this month only 1 and 2 are really options.

                      S This user is from outside of this forum
                      S This user is from outside of this forum
                      soup@lemmy.world
                      wrote last edited by
                      #58

                      PP was not going to let the US annex us as much as he probably cums all over himself thinking about it. Hell even right now his polling is dogshit and if he tried to actually make Canada a 51st state he’d get crucified(if he didn’t then we’d fucking deserve it anyway).

                      The NDP is only not an option because we say and act like it isn’t. They run plenty of candidates and a vote cast for them is worth the same as a vote cast for anyone else. The Liberal voters could have just as easily “strategically” voted for the NDP but nooo we always have to vote Liberal as the default. That’s fucking stupid as hell and you can’t ignore that fact and expect me to just go “oh right I forgot that this only works in one direction!”

                      There is nothing strategic about strategic voting. It is only done when the centrists threaten the left, and it only works in one direction. It’s an obvious trap that we fall for every time because no one actually thinks before they do anything. We could change our behaviour so easily.

                      Did you know that in the election before last, even with all the shit messaging from the Liberals, the NDP got more than half their votes? They HAVE support even if our system meant that the seats weren’t there. Someone admitting that they didn’t look at the numbers with any depth isn’t a gotcha.

                      J 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • S This user is from outside of this forum
                        S This user is from outside of this forum
                        soup@lemmy.world
                        wrote last edited by
                        #59

                        I’m sure! But now we just have two conservative parties so go us! Like, we haven’t fixed anything with this brain-dead behaviour, all we’ve done is temporarily made things not quite as bad for the cost of obliterating our representation and further cementing our country as a centrist and right-wing garbage hole. Carney’s government literally tried to make the Air Canada strike illegal for some fucking reason; they don’t care about you and you’re fucking yourself in your own ass with a rusty iron poker while telling everyone how clever you are for doing it.

                        Congratulations! You’re a big smart hero for voting away your values like a good scared little baby.

                        R 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • Sunshine (she/her)S Sunshine (she/her)

                          The corporate liberals are gutting taxes on private jets, yachts and unused housing while Mark Carney is telling struggling canadians to make sacrifices.

                          M This user is from outside of this forum
                          M This user is from outside of this forum
                          masterspace@lemmy.ca
                          wrote last edited by
                          #60

                          This is reactionary bullshit just to get angry because you’re online.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • rozodruR rozodru

                            oh and don’t forget they also want to give $1billion to AI development over the next 5 years.

                            M This user is from outside of this forum
                            M This user is from outside of this forum
                            masterspace@lemmy.ca
                            wrote last edited by masterspace@lemmy.ca
                            #61

                            Yeah, that we are already benefiting enormously economically from our early investments in AI, it would be dumb not to continue, especially at a time when the US is scaring away many top international researchers.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • C Cyborganism

                              It’s absolutely horrible. How disconnected are these fucking people???

                              I told everyone on here that voting in Mark Carney was going to be a big mistake. I was right. Yet, there are still people on here saying “give him a chance, he’s the best option we have”. No. actually. He’s not, and I see what happens when we “give him a chance”?? He fucks average Canadians over for the benefit of the rich.

                              They’re stuck in this 80’s Reagan-Thatcher-Mulroney era of neo-liberalism trickle down bullshit and they can’t see outside that fucking box.

                              M This user is from outside of this forum
                              M This user is from outside of this forum
                              masterspace@lemmy.ca
                              wrote last edited by
                              #62

                              Lmao it’s not fucking horrible, you just used the outrage machine and found people outraged by it. Congratulations, social media is toxic.

                              Read coverage of it from actual informed people, not dumbass YouTubers.

                              C 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • R reluctant_squidd@lemmy.ca

                                Still probably much better than the alternative.

                                Although, as long as the populace allows corporations to financially incentivize politics, corruption is going to be the default mode.

                                M This user is from outside of this forum
                                M This user is from outside of this forum
                                masterspace@lemmy.ca
                                wrote last edited by
                                #63

                                It is legitimately not even as simple as Canadians wanting to do something given that corporations have shown that they are very very willing to flee countries to others if they don’t like the policy there.

                                Redditors and Lemmings are quite frankly, naiive children in their approach to politics. Just picking the most “altruistic” path and ignoring the realities of the way the world works is not going to bring about the outcome you want.

                                R 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • V Victor Villas

                                  How much farther right does the centrist party needs to go before the far-right option drops of the table and the “leftist” option becomes viable as the new center? The southern neighbour has shown us: too much

                                  M This user is from outside of this forum
                                  M This user is from outside of this forum
                                  masterspace@lemmy.ca
                                  wrote last edited by masterspace@lemmy.ca
                                  #64

                                  Lmao, thinking the Liberals are far right, because they tabled a budget based on actual finances and economics is honestly, just asinine.

                                  You people need to stop getting your news from social media. You use the outrage machine and you find someone who will make everything seem outrageous. Congratulations.

                                  Maybe try the sober second thought machine instead?

                                  V 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • M masterspace@lemmy.ca

                                    Lmao it’s not fucking horrible, you just used the outrage machine and found people outraged by it. Congratulations, social media is toxic.

                                    Read coverage of it from actual informed people, not dumbass YouTubers.

                                    C This user is from outside of this forum
                                    C This user is from outside of this forum
                                    Cyborganism
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #65

                                    She’s an actual journalist who used to work for the CBC. She’s not just some Youtuber.

                                    M 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • C Cyborganism

                                      She’s an actual journalist who used to work for the CBC. She’s not just some Youtuber.

                                      M This user is from outside of this forum
                                      M This user is from outside of this forum
                                      masterspace@lemmy.ca
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #66

                                      Lmao. That is not actual journalism.

                                      This is f-tier social media rage bait. Her reasoning boils down to ‘generational investments’ involve tax breaks to businesses, therefore generational investments are the devil.

                                      This is literally the most garbage way to inform yourself about the budget. Go read the Guardian, or CBC, or any actual journalism. Here’s a hint: it will talk specifically about what the money is being spent on and what is being cut, it won’t just be some ranting into a camera to get clicks.

                                      C 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • Sunshine (she/her)S Sunshine (she/her)
                                        This post did not contain any content.
                                        M This user is from outside of this forum
                                        M This user is from outside of this forum
                                        masterspace@lemmy.ca
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #67

                                        This is f-tier toxic social media rage bait.

                                        She’s says literally nothing of substance, just makes sweeping generalizations to try and get outraged for clicks.

                                        Go read actual written journalism.

                                        C 1 Reply Last reply
                                        13
                                        • Sunshine (she/her)S Sunshine (she/her)
                                          This post did not contain any content.
                                          agm@lemmy.caA This user is from outside of this forum
                                          agm@lemmy.caA This user is from outside of this forum
                                          agm@lemmy.ca
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #68

                                          I am totally okay with a Liberal party that marginalizes the CPC’s extreme voters by moving right and appealing to their more moderate voters, thereby also alienating people who are more on the left inside the Liberal tent so that the NDP has more potential for resurgence. Seems like the kind of thing that might be good for a multi-party system.

                                          R 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0

                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          • First post
                                            Last post