Skip to content
0
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Sketchy)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Wandering Adventure Party

  1. Home
  2. PC Gaming
  3. Valve Responds To Steam Machine's HDMI 2.1 Display Support Controversy [HW support is there, but "The HDMI forum" doesn’t allow with OpenSource drivers]

Valve Responds To Steam Machine's HDMI 2.1 Display Support Controversy [HW support is there, but "The HDMI forum" doesn’t allow with OpenSource drivers]

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved PC Gaming
pcgaming
125 Posts 64 Posters 19 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • A artyom

    We don’t flock to it, they are forced upon us. Finding TVs that support DP is almost impossible.

    Nothing is forced on anyone. If people refused to buy them they would be forced to add other ports.

    However as someone who considers themselves fairly techy and doesn’t comply with such shitfuckery, I only learned about this last week.

    Moving forward I just won’t be buying any TVs at all.

    Edit: God fucking forbid any of you actually do anything, or even better, refrain from doing anything, besides bitch and moan on the internet.

    R This user is from outside of this forum
    R This user is from outside of this forum
    ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    wrote on last edited by
    #47

    This ethical position is such crap in the modern era and if you take it you simply aren’t going to be contributing to this conversation much longer. Unless you go full stallman and get a specific laptop from 15 years ago with very specific hardware that you can flash and install very specific software onto it you have to make peace with the fact that as a modern consumer the landscape has fucked you.

    Your choices are to moderate how fucked yoh get in terms of anticonsumer bullshit because the market is stacked against you and the illusion of choice is always there. HDMI is a great example, smartphone platforms outside of android and ios is another. Are their options outside of these walled gardens? Technically but they’re generally much worse and often cost more than a comparable model.

    It’s just you can refuse to buy an iphone, you can refuse to buy an android, but you can’t really refuse to buy a smartphone in the modern era. You can refuse to buy a tv but you can’t really refuse to buy a display of some kind. You might think you beat the system if you just get a laptop or computer monitor I guess but not really, monitors increasingly don’t have DP and frankly the whole “vote with your wallet” thing is stupid anyway. Consumers are idiots who will continually vote to fuck themselves. We need regulatory oversight.

    A 1 Reply Last reply
    19
    • woelkchen@lemmy.worldW woelkchen@lemmy.world

      People who connect TVs to the Internet only invite malware. They usually don’t receive big fixes after a few years and tend to spy on all watched content.

      B This user is from outside of this forum
      B This user is from outside of this forum
      brucethemoose@lemmy.world
      wrote on last edited by brucethemoose@lemmy.world
      #48

      Then watch on a plug-in Android TV box. Or take to the high seas.

      I’m just saying, if you’re going to stream from an internet service anyway, video/audio on every HTPC streaming app I’ve tried looks bad. Netflix is the best, and it’s still heavily compromised. And (at least on my Sony), the local Android apps tend to have the best system integration for rescaling, HDR, setting the correct refresh rate, per app IQ settings and so on.

      But that obviously doesn’t apply if you’re hosting it locally though Kodi, Jellyfin, Plex or whatever.

      1 Reply Last reply
      1
      • S snowpenguin@lemmy.ca

        Sincerely! As someone who dislikes DisplayPort, moves like that makes me want to use it over HDMI.

        thingsiplay@beehaw.orgT This user is from outside of this forum
        thingsiplay@beehaw.orgT This user is from outside of this forum
        thingsiplay@beehaw.org
        wrote on last edited by
        #49

        Hmm, that’s a new one for me. Why the dislike for DisplayPort?

        S 1 Reply Last reply
        15
        • R ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com

          This ethical position is such crap in the modern era and if you take it you simply aren’t going to be contributing to this conversation much longer. Unless you go full stallman and get a specific laptop from 15 years ago with very specific hardware that you can flash and install very specific software onto it you have to make peace with the fact that as a modern consumer the landscape has fucked you.

          Your choices are to moderate how fucked yoh get in terms of anticonsumer bullshit because the market is stacked against you and the illusion of choice is always there. HDMI is a great example, smartphone platforms outside of android and ios is another. Are their options outside of these walled gardens? Technically but they’re generally much worse and often cost more than a comparable model.

          It’s just you can refuse to buy an iphone, you can refuse to buy an android, but you can’t really refuse to buy a smartphone in the modern era. You can refuse to buy a tv but you can’t really refuse to buy a display of some kind. You might think you beat the system if you just get a laptop or computer monitor I guess but not really, monitors increasingly don’t have DP and frankly the whole “vote with your wallet” thing is stupid anyway. Consumers are idiots who will continually vote to fuck themselves. We need regulatory oversight.

          A This user is from outside of this forum
          A This user is from outside of this forum
          artyom
          wrote on last edited by
          #50

          the whole “vote with your wallet” thing is stupid anyway

          Voting with your wallet is literally the only way things will ever improve.

          Z R A G 4 Replies Last reply
          2
          • A artyom

            the whole “vote with your wallet” thing is stupid anyway

            Voting with your wallet is literally the only way things will ever improve.

            Z This user is from outside of this forum
            Z This user is from outside of this forum
            zorque@lemmy.world
            wrote on last edited by
            #51

            This explains so much why actual voting numbers are so poor in the US…

            1 Reply Last reply
            5
            • A artyom

              We don’t flock to it, they are forced upon us. Finding TVs that support DP is almost impossible.

              Nothing is forced on anyone. If people refused to buy them they would be forced to add other ports.

              However as someone who considers themselves fairly techy and doesn’t comply with such shitfuckery, I only learned about this last week.

              Moving forward I just won’t be buying any TVs at all.

              Edit: God fucking forbid any of you actually do anything, or even better, refrain from doing anything, besides bitch and moan on the internet.

              F This user is from outside of this forum
              F This user is from outside of this forum
              frizzo
              wrote on last edited by
              #52

              Now if you could just convince the rest of the country to not have a TV in every room of their houses.

              1 Reply Last reply
              3
              • Z This user is from outside of this forum
                Z This user is from outside of this forum
                zorque@lemmy.world
                wrote on last edited by
                #53

                Well, apparently in your opinion, money is the only way to have effective change in the world. Any other attempt to do so will fail miserably.

                1 Reply Last reply
                4
                • A artyom

                  the whole “vote with your wallet” thing is stupid anyway

                  Voting with your wallet is literally the only way things will ever improve.

                  R This user is from outside of this forum
                  R This user is from outside of this forum
                  ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #54

                  See how well that has worked over the past 40 years? I mean don’t buy shit you don’t support obviously but don’t expect a personal boycott or even advocating heavily for others to the same to have any kind of impact whatsoever.

                  It’s because the average consumer is dumb but this isn’t an indictment of the average consumer, necessarily. The average consumer doesn’t want to have to do research on every fucking thing they buy to find out the nefarious bullshit about it. Oh the tv doesn’t support open connection standards, oh my phone is a walled garden built for data collection, oh this smart lightbulb is a privacy nightmare with bullshit tos and also has security issues, etc. They just want to go on amazon or to home depot or whatever and buy shit that looks like it will do what they need for a price point they can afford.

                  That’s where regulatory oversight comes in: given the above and a consistent lack of consumer ability to enforce standards we need political oversight to pick up the slack. This is a unified arm where a consumer frustration can turn into action much more quickly, even if sales continue because of market fuckery (eg tvs still selling because you can only buy hdmi TVs). But unfortunately we live in a country where the tech industry has performed a near and total regulatory capture and has no fear that regulatory oversight will ever occur, and they’re probably right, at least for now.

                  So you’re wrong that it’s the only way, and I would argue it’s the most ineffective and inefficient way. It just feels like it’s the only way because of our failed state political situation where even a regulatory concern that should be a slam dunk like right to repair often either fails or only passes in a greatly neutered state because the local politicians thought Microsoft and Apple made some great points about preventing local jobs so that tech billionaires could continue to make even more money

                  A 1 Reply Last reply
                  13
                  • B brucethemoose@lemmy.world

                    TBH you should be playing DRM content though smart TV/TV box apps anyway. Desktop Windows playback is more technically limited (for instance, no auto resolution/refresh rate switching) and aside from that you usually get a worse bitrate stream on a stuttery player.

                    I don’t even know about DRM playback on Linux.

                    A This user is from outside of this forum
                    A This user is from outside of this forum
                    atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #55

                    You should literally never use the apps built in to your TV. Unless you just really like letting the TV manufacturer know exactly what you are watching and when.

                    On Linux you check the box in Firefox that says Allow DRM Content and then yes, as far as I know, you need to be using laptop or a HDMI display.

                    paraphrandP 1 Reply Last reply
                    7
                    • A artyom

                      the whole “vote with your wallet” thing is stupid anyway

                      Voting with your wallet is literally the only way things will ever improve.

                      A This user is from outside of this forum
                      A This user is from outside of this forum
                      ayyy@sh.itjust.works
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #56

                      The only way? Literally?

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      4
                      • R ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com

                        See how well that has worked over the past 40 years? I mean don’t buy shit you don’t support obviously but don’t expect a personal boycott or even advocating heavily for others to the same to have any kind of impact whatsoever.

                        It’s because the average consumer is dumb but this isn’t an indictment of the average consumer, necessarily. The average consumer doesn’t want to have to do research on every fucking thing they buy to find out the nefarious bullshit about it. Oh the tv doesn’t support open connection standards, oh my phone is a walled garden built for data collection, oh this smart lightbulb is a privacy nightmare with bullshit tos and also has security issues, etc. They just want to go on amazon or to home depot or whatever and buy shit that looks like it will do what they need for a price point they can afford.

                        That’s where regulatory oversight comes in: given the above and a consistent lack of consumer ability to enforce standards we need political oversight to pick up the slack. This is a unified arm where a consumer frustration can turn into action much more quickly, even if sales continue because of market fuckery (eg tvs still selling because you can only buy hdmi TVs). But unfortunately we live in a country where the tech industry has performed a near and total regulatory capture and has no fear that regulatory oversight will ever occur, and they’re probably right, at least for now.

                        So you’re wrong that it’s the only way, and I would argue it’s the most ineffective and inefficient way. It just feels like it’s the only way because of our failed state political situation where even a regulatory concern that should be a slam dunk like right to repair often either fails or only passes in a greatly neutered state because the local politicians thought Microsoft and Apple made some great points about preventing local jobs so that tech billionaires could continue to make even more money

                        A This user is from outside of this forum
                        A This user is from outside of this forum
                        artyom
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #57

                        See how well that has worked over the past 40 years?

                        …extremely well? Can you provide an example of the contrary?

                        don’t expect a personal boycott or even advocating heavily for others to the same to have any kind of impact whatsoever.

                        …of course a single person boycotting a product does nothing. People educating themselves about the products they buy and making conscious decisions to buy consumer-friendly products when buying shit (especially expensive shit) does.

                        They just want to go on amazon or to home depot or whatever and buy shit that looks like it will do what they need for a price point they can afford.

                        Plenty of people know and just don’t care. I know because I have these types of conversations all the time.

                        That’s where regulatory oversight comes in

                        See how well that has worked over the past 2000 years?

                        AmbiguousPropsA R 2 Replies Last reply
                        0
                        • renegadespork@lemmy.jelliefrontier.netR renegadespork@lemmy.jelliefrontier.net

                          I’m not sure where I got this idea, but I thought it was because Display Port doesn’t carry audio, and a single-cable solution was more appealing.

                          But apparently Display Port also supports audio, just none of my devices seem to recognize it…?

                          Apparently the only advantage of HDMI is ARC (Audio Return Channel), allowing devices to send audio back to the video source, which might be useful in some home theater setups.

                          G This user is from outside of this forum
                          G This user is from outside of this forum
                          goun@lemmy.ml
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #58

                          Ohh TIL, thanks! I could count the times I needed the TV to send audio back to the home theater, like if I want to watch open channels or something.

                          I think we could live without it, just plug an audio cable or something, fuck hdmi.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • S stoy@lemmy.zip

                            Funny, I have done it for years at home, I guess I am just confused

                            G This user is from outside of this forum
                            G This user is from outside of this forum
                            goun@lemmy.ml
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #59

                            Somebody replied to other comment, but it seems like hdmi allows audio to be sent back, like, if you wanted your screen to send audio to the computer… which would be weird in most PC scenarios, but not so much on TVs.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            1
                            • E This user is from outside of this forum
                              E This user is from outside of this forum
                              entwine@programming.dev
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #60

                              I haveb’t looked into this particular group, but usually it’s patents. Someone owns a patent for the tech required to implement the standard, and they “license” it out to anyone who wants to implement that standard. Obviously, they won’t agree to terms that hurt their ability to collect rent on their patent. Qualcomm is famously guilty of this in the modem space.

                              Does that seem stupid, to adopt an industry standard that requires patented technology to implement? That’s because it is, and were we a sane society we would invalidate any patents that become an industry standard, but we’re a bunch of idiots with a billionaire cuck fetish.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              1
                              • renegadespork@lemmy.jelliefrontier.netR renegadespork@lemmy.jelliefrontier.net

                                I’m not sure where I got this idea, but I thought it was because Display Port doesn’t carry audio, and a single-cable solution was more appealing.

                                But apparently Display Port also supports audio, just none of my devices seem to recognize it…?

                                Apparently the only advantage of HDMI is ARC (Audio Return Channel), allowing devices to send audio back to the video source, which might be useful in some home theater setups.

                                E This user is from outside of this forum
                                E This user is from outside of this forum
                                entwine@programming.dev
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #61

                                Wow I always assumed the same thing lol

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                1
                                • alessandro@lemmy.caA alessandro@lemmy.ca
                                  This post did not contain any content.
                                  N This user is from outside of this forum
                                  N This user is from outside of this forum
                                  notmyoldredditname@lemmy.world
                                  wrote on last edited by notmyoldredditname@lemmy.world
                                  #62

                                  I remember when HDMI came out and then DP.

                                  I wish I knew what was actually going on at the time with regards to licensing, I just knew they both worked and didn’t really pay much attention to things. Sometimes I’d use DP sometimes HDMI.

                                  If I’d known, I definitely would have made a more concerted effort to support DP when it could have made a bigger difference.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  73
                                  • S stoy@lemmy.zip

                                    HDMI requires a license cost, DisplayPort is free.

                                    What advantage does HDMI hold over DisplayPort?

                                    R This user is from outside of this forum
                                    R This user is from outside of this forum
                                    ramble81@lemmy.zip
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #63

                                    My understanding is it’s not even a licensing issue. The HDMI consortium won’t let you include features from 2.1 and 2.2 in an open source driver. it sounds like Valve would be willing to pay, but they’d have to include a closed source driver for the video card.

                                    S 1 Reply Last reply
                                    20
                                    • S stoy@lemmy.zip

                                      HDMI requires a license cost, DisplayPort is free.

                                      What advantage does HDMI hold over DisplayPort?

                                      R This user is from outside of this forum
                                      R This user is from outside of this forum
                                      rabidhamster@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                                      wrote on last edited by rabidhamster@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                                      #64

                                      HDMI has always sucked. I used DVI for the longest time, because HDMI couldn’t push enough pixels to a 1920x1200 display (topped out at 1080p for the longest time). Then jumped straight to display port when I finally got a 4k monitor.

                                      HDMI was always 4-5 years behind other contemporary protocols, and for your trouble, you also got a stack of proprietary bullshit to go with it.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      22
                                      • C This user is from outside of this forum
                                        C This user is from outside of this forum
                                        chaogomu@lemmy.world
                                        wrote on last edited by chaogomu@lemmy.world
                                        #65

                                        The HDMI founders were Hitachi, Matsushita (now Panasonic), Maxell, Philips, Silicon Image (now Lattice Semiconductor), Sony, Thomson (now Vantiva), and Toshiba.[3] Intel contributed the HDCP copy protection system.[4] The new format won the support of motion picture studios Fox, Universal, Warner Bros. and Disney, along with content distributors DirecTV, EchoStar (Dish Network) and CableLabs.[2]

                                        While Sony is a technology company, they’re also a very sue happy IP holder through Sony pictures and Playstation.

                                        Sony continues to be a major player on the HDMI forum.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        23
                                        • A artyom

                                          the whole “vote with your wallet” thing is stupid anyway

                                          Voting with your wallet is literally the only way things will ever improve.

                                          G This user is from outside of this forum
                                          G This user is from outside of this forum
                                          grue@lemmy.world
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #66

                                          Quit posting ancap propaganda.

                                          The way this sort of thing would actually improve is by government regulation.

                                          ? 1 Reply Last reply
                                          9

                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          • First post
                                            Last post