Skip to content
0
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Sketchy)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Wandering Adventure Party

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. UK PEOPLE: this is REALLY IMPORTANT.

UK PEOPLE: this is REALLY IMPORTANT.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
117 Posts 60 Posters 5 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Charlie StrossC Charlie Stross

    @Fonant @david_chisnall You Are Wrong. The government can seize your computer and *then* search it, if you did something else. Consider why rape prosecutions in the UK collapsed since 2018—cops routinely seized and searched rape victims' phones for evidence of contact with the alleged rapist before or after the incident, so they stopped coming forward.

    FonantF This user is from outside of this forum
    FonantF This user is from outside of this forum
    Fonant
    wrote last edited by
    #48

    @cstross @david_chisnall I agree. Allowing for inspection of innocent people's personal computers is both unacceptable and also counter-productive for law enforcement.

    The police are not going to be randomly doing "illegal VPN inspections" on everyone. They can only target the few big public VPN services, and persuade them to add age verification.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • kitH kit

      @oschonrock
      I'm assuming that this is the government's intention. To produce a generation of teenagers who understand TOR, and choose to use it as a first step, using their phones as routers and randomised exit points.
      @cstross

      Oliver SchönrockO This user is from outside of this forum
      Oliver SchönrockO This user is from outside of this forum
      Oliver Schönrock
      wrote last edited by
      #49

      @hypostase @cstross

      I have no idea if that is their intention. Highly doubt it, given how clueless they are.

      The smart ones will use TOR bridges so it's even less trackable.

      But then you were probably being sarcastic, and well, I agree. That's what happens when you put stupid logs in people's way.. they learn to jump over them. And some will break their legs doing it.

      kitH 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • FonantF Fonant

        @cstross @david_chisnall I'm not planning to do anything that would result in the government seizing my computer 🙂

        There is no way the government can know whether or not I use a VPN or not, nor whether I use TOR.

        Unless the law allows the police to randomly inspect people's computers, and they do this to a significant proportion of the population, I can use any VPN I like without fear. We don't live in a police state yet...

        Charlie StrossC This user is from outside of this forum
        Charlie StrossC This user is from outside of this forum
        Charlie Stross
        wrote last edited by
        #50

        @Fonant @david_chisnall Sure you're not planning on doing anything. That doesn't mean it won't happen to you. Remember, "if you've got nothing to hide you've got nothing to fear" was a favourite saying of Lavrenti Beria.

        FonantF 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • Oliver SchönrockO Oliver Schönrock

          @PeterSommerlad @cstross

          So in the context of this discussion, and if you lived in the UK, would you object to being age/identity verified when purchasing your vpn subscription?

          It is almost certainly not an annonymous transaction anyway, as those are very very difficult to execute..?

          FonantF This user is from outside of this forum
          FonantF This user is from outside of this forum
          Fonant
          wrote last edited by
          #51

          @oschonrock @PeterSommerlad @cstross I'm presuming they'd want to check your age every time you USE a VPN connection? Otherwise the restriction on underage use would be meaningless.

          Charlie StrossC Oliver SchönrockO 2 Replies Last reply
          0
          • mbpazM mbpaz

            @cstross Ethical issues aside - how are m2m VPNs expected to validate their age?

            "hi, I'm an environment monitoring device and was born barely 6 months ago, but I swear I'm old enough to use my built-in VPN to access my MQTT server"

            UilebheistU This user is from outside of this forum
            UilebheistU This user is from outside of this forum
            Uilebheist
            wrote last edited by
            #52

            @mbpaz @cstross My router is over 18 years old, and I'm not replacing it. And I can prove its age.

            mbpazM 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • FonantF Fonant

              @oschonrock @PeterSommerlad @cstross I'm presuming they'd want to check your age every time you USE a VPN connection? Otherwise the restriction on underage use would be meaningless.

              Charlie StrossC This user is from outside of this forum
              Charlie StrossC This user is from outside of this forum
              Charlie Stross
              wrote last edited by
              #53

              @Fonant @oschonrock @PeterSommerlad The people proposing this amendment in the House of Lords are technical illiterates, that's what makes this so dangerous. So it will be interpreted over-broadly and damagingly with inevitable, unpredictable, side-effects.

              Oliver SchönrockO 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • FonantF Fonant

                @oschonrock @PeterSommerlad @cstross I'm presuming they'd want to check your age every time you USE a VPN connection? Otherwise the restriction on underage use would be meaningless.

                Oliver SchönrockO This user is from outside of this forum
                Oliver SchönrockO This user is from outside of this forum
                Oliver Schönrock
                wrote last edited by
                #54

                @Fonant @PeterSommerlad @cstross

                I doubt that... Or actually... they prob haven't thought about that sort of useful detail.

                But just like when your porn account has been age/verified once, you then just "log in" (or carry some kind jwt in a permanent cookie) for subsequent usage.

                And yes, if your kid can get access to your computer and log in as you, then all bets are off.

                VPNs will likely be similar?

                FonantF 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • Charlie StrossC Charlie Stross

                  @Fonant @david_chisnall Sure you're not planning on doing anything. That doesn't mean it won't happen to you. Remember, "if you've got nothing to hide you've got nothing to fear" was a favourite saying of Lavrenti Beria.

                  FonantF This user is from outside of this forum
                  FonantF This user is from outside of this forum
                  Fonant
                  wrote last edited by
                  #55

                  @cstross @david_chisnall The likelihood of the police taking my computer for forensic examination is zero.

                  I have plenty of things that I must keep private. So does everyone.

                  Magnus AhltorpA RetR 2 Replies Last reply
                  0
                  • Charlie StrossC Charlie Stross

                    @Fonant @oschonrock @PeterSommerlad The people proposing this amendment in the House of Lords are technical illiterates, that's what makes this so dangerous. So it will be interpreted over-broadly and damagingly with inevitable, unpredictable, side-effects.

                    Oliver SchönrockO This user is from outside of this forum
                    Oliver SchönrockO This user is from outside of this forum
                    Oliver Schönrock
                    wrote last edited by
                    #56

                    @cstross @Fonant @PeterSommerlad

                    100% agreed...

                    The entire bill is totally technically illiterate with all sorts of backfiring fishhooks... embarrasing really.

                    No idea why Labour feels the need to do this sort of thing.

                    Worldproof the child, not childproof the world. And parents' responsibility.

                    Charlie StrossC 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • Oliver SchönrockO Oliver Schönrock

                      @Fonant @PeterSommerlad @cstross

                      I doubt that... Or actually... they prob haven't thought about that sort of useful detail.

                      But just like when your porn account has been age/verified once, you then just "log in" (or carry some kind jwt in a permanent cookie) for subsequent usage.

                      And yes, if your kid can get access to your computer and log in as you, then all bets are off.

                      VPNs will likely be similar?

                      FonantF This user is from outside of this forum
                      FonantF This user is from outside of this forum
                      Fonant
                      wrote last edited by
                      #57

                      @oschonrock @PeterSommerlad @cstross Yes. They can legislate as much as they want to age-verify all VPN users. Mathematics and logic makes this impossible to enforce in any meaningful way, though.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • UilebheistU Uilebheist

                        @mbpaz @cstross My router is over 18 years old, and I'm not replacing it. And I can prove its age.

                        mbpazM This user is from outside of this forum
                        mbpazM This user is from outside of this forum
                        mbpaz
                        wrote last edited by
                        #58

                        @Uilebheist @cstross "I'm an aging router, and I assume responsibility for any outbound packets these young devices connecting to me may send "

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • Oliver SchönrockO Oliver Schönrock

                          @cstross @Fonant @PeterSommerlad

                          100% agreed...

                          The entire bill is totally technically illiterate with all sorts of backfiring fishhooks... embarrasing really.

                          No idea why Labour feels the need to do this sort of thing.

                          Worldproof the child, not childproof the world. And parents' responsibility.

                          Charlie StrossC This user is from outside of this forum
                          Charlie StrossC This user is from outside of this forum
                          Charlie Stross
                          wrote last edited by
                          #59

                          @oschonrock @Fonant @PeterSommerlad Labour has a nasty paternalist/nanny state tradition going back over a century. It's baked in at this point: Labour knows what's best for you, peasant. (So do the Tories, but they approach it differently.)

                          Oliver SchönrockO FonantF Ulrich_the_Elder, 🇨🇦,🇺🇦U 3 Replies Last reply
                          0
                          • Charlie StrossC Charlie Stross

                            @oschonrock @Fonant @PeterSommerlad Labour has a nasty paternalist/nanny state tradition going back over a century. It's baked in at this point: Labour knows what's best for you, peasant. (So do the Tories, but they approach it differently.)

                            Oliver SchönrockO This user is from outside of this forum
                            Oliver SchönrockO This user is from outside of this forum
                            Oliver Schönrock
                            wrote last edited by
                            #60

                            @cstross @Fonant @PeterSommerlad

                            Complex subject.

                            For example, I would be quite pro a complete twitter ban in EU/UK.

                            Is that "nanny state", or is that recognising that X is deliberately manipulated to be a malignant anti-democratic cancer?

                            Porn for kids.... TBH, I get less excited about that, and selective blocking is hard/impractical.

                            FonantF Magnus AhltorpA 2 Replies Last reply
                            0
                            • FonantF Fonant

                              @cstross @david_chisnall I'm not planning to do anything that would result in the government seizing my computer 🙂

                              There is no way the government can know whether or not I use a VPN or not, nor whether I use TOR.

                              Unless the law allows the police to randomly inspect people's computers, and they do this to a significant proportion of the population, I can use any VPN I like without fear. We don't live in a police state yet...

                              Nicovel0 🍉N This user is from outside of this forum
                              Nicovel0 🍉N This user is from outside of this forum
                              Nicovel0 🍉
                              wrote last edited by
                              #61

                              @Fonant @cstross @david_chisnall emphasis on yet. When you go through the U.K. border they can seize for inspection all devices you are carrying, no matter your citizenship.

                              FonantF 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • Charlie StrossC Charlie Stross

                                RE: https://social.vivaldi.net/@LonM/115966748145817371

                                UK PEOPLE: this is REALLY IMPORTANT. If the government bans under-16s from using VPNs, then logically they must intend to REQUIRE AGE VERIFICATION FOR ALL VPN USE. Which will affect adults too!

                                *Your* privacy and right to anonymous web browsing is at risk!

                                Rhys 🦊S This user is from outside of this forum
                                Rhys 🦊S This user is from outside of this forum
                                Rhys 🦊
                                wrote last edited by
                                #62

                                @cstross There's no way they can possibly enforce this for existing VPN users.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • Nicovel0 🍉N Nicovel0 🍉

                                  @Fonant @cstross @david_chisnall emphasis on yet. When you go through the U.K. border they can seize for inspection all devices you are carrying, no matter your citizenship.

                                  FonantF This user is from outside of this forum
                                  FonantF This user is from outside of this forum
                                  Fonant
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #63

                                  @Nicovel0 @cstross @david_chisnall Yeah, but I'm not going to be carrying my desktop computer on foreign trips.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • Oliver SchönrockO Oliver Schönrock

                                    @cstross @Fonant @PeterSommerlad

                                    Complex subject.

                                    For example, I would be quite pro a complete twitter ban in EU/UK.

                                    Is that "nanny state", or is that recognising that X is deliberately manipulated to be a malignant anti-democratic cancer?

                                    Porn for kids.... TBH, I get less excited about that, and selective blocking is hard/impractical.

                                    FonantF This user is from outside of this forum
                                    FonantF This user is from outside of this forum
                                    Fonant
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #64

                                    @oschonrock @cstross @PeterSommerlad A ban on Twitter in the EU would also be impossible to enforce.

                                    Oliver SchönrockO 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • Charlie StrossC Charlie Stross

                                      @capriciousday Like banks and other financial institutions who require their employees to use them when working out of the office, or over wifi *within* the office.

                                      HighlandLawyerH This user is from outside of this forum
                                      HighlandLawyerH This user is from outside of this forum
                                      HighlandLawyer
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #65

                                      @cstross @capriciousday Lawyers likewise. Working at home or in a court building, using confidential & legally privileged data on the office server...

                                      UilebheistU Ben CurthoysB 2 Replies Last reply
                                      0
                                      • HighlandLawyerH HighlandLawyer

                                        @cstross @capriciousday Lawyers likewise. Working at home or in a court building, using confidential & legally privileged data on the office server...

                                        UilebheistU This user is from outside of this forum
                                        UilebheistU This user is from outside of this forum
                                        Uilebheist
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #66

                                        @HighlandLawyer @cstross @capriciousday They'll argue that lawyers are over 18 "and why would be a problem to prove that?".
                                        Remember it's the "Labour" party we are talking about.

                                        HighlandLawyerH 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • FonantF Fonant

                                          @oschonrock @cstross @PeterSommerlad A ban on Twitter in the EU would also be impossible to enforce.

                                          Oliver SchönrockO This user is from outside of this forum
                                          Oliver SchönrockO This user is from outside of this forum
                                          Oliver Schönrock
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #67

                                          @Fonant @cstross @PeterSommerlad
                                          Yes, I agree that geoblocking would have many holes (vpns, tor, etc), but that is acceptable in this case, IMO

                                          Because the threat that ban would be trying protect against, is serious damage to Europe's democracies. Democracy is a numbers game by definition. So to eliminate a major source of malignant misinformation for say 90% people who can't be bothered to circumvent the geoblock, would destroy the network effect that is so core to any social network's power.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0

                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          • First post
                                            Last post