Skip to content
0
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Sketchy)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Wandering Adventure Party

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Gentle reminder that EVERYONE shot by ICE or the police is innocent.

Gentle reminder that EVERYONE shot by ICE or the police is innocent.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
76 Posts 34 Posters 1 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Kid ManiaC Kid Mania

    @ariaflame @connynasch @theleftistlawyer
    "Everything is ultimately peculiar and ultimately ridiculous."
    - Thomas Ligotti

    AriaflameA This user is from outside of this forum
    AriaflameA This user is from outside of this forum
    Ariaflame
    wrote last edited by
    #47

    @clintruin @connynasch @theleftistlawyer That doesn't address my comment. Did you vote last election? Are you acting to improve things? Or are you just giving up and trying to make others despair?

    Kid ManiaC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • Sheryl WeikalT Sheryl Weikal

      Gentle reminder that EVERYONE shot by ICE or the police is innocent. Every single one. Cops aren't Judge Dredd. A person is innocent until proven guilty IN A COURT, so until a person is found guilty by a judge or jury, they're innocent. They're ALL innocent.

      Rusty RingR This user is from outside of this forum
      Rusty RingR This user is from outside of this forum
      Rusty Ring
      wrote last edited by
      #48

      @theleftistlawyer

      Make that _unless_ proven guilty.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • Sheryl WeikalT Sheryl Weikal

        Gentle reminder that EVERYONE shot by ICE or the police is innocent. Every single one. Cops aren't Judge Dredd. A person is innocent until proven guilty IN A COURT, so until a person is found guilty by a judge or jury, they're innocent. They're ALL innocent.

        rholdR This user is from outside of this forum
        rholdR This user is from outside of this forum
        rhold
        wrote last edited by
        #49

        @theleftistlawyer and even with a proper court ruling, most countries and US states abolished the death penalty.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • Sheryl WeikalT Sheryl Weikal

          Gentle reminder that EVERYONE shot by ICE or the police is innocent. Every single one. Cops aren't Judge Dredd. A person is innocent until proven guilty IN A COURT, so until a person is found guilty by a judge or jury, they're innocent. They're ALL innocent.

          0ptimist0 This user is from outside of this forum
          0ptimist0 This user is from outside of this forum
          0ptimist
          wrote last edited by
          #50

          @theleftistlawyer
          👏👏👏👍👍

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • Sheryl WeikalT Sheryl Weikal

            Gentle reminder that EVERYONE shot by ICE or the police is innocent. Every single one. Cops aren't Judge Dredd. A person is innocent until proven guilty IN A COURT, so until a person is found guilty by a judge or jury, they're innocent. They're ALL innocent.

            SharquaydiusS This user is from outside of this forum
            SharquaydiusS This user is from outside of this forum
            Sharquaydius
            wrote last edited by
            #51

            @theleftistlawyer true. mexican courts did indeed convict them of rape, drug, and firearm offences. gotta love those mexican courts doing their job. BTW, remember when cartels had absolute control and courts were powerless? i certainly remember. i also remember colombia during the 90s. glad we have moved into an era of relative law and order.

            also, psychopath squads in sudan, currently machine-gunning civilians, just like cartels used to do in mexico. funny how that's not a priority.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • Sheryl WeikalT Sheryl Weikal

              Gentle reminder that EVERYONE shot by ICE or the police is innocent. Every single one. Cops aren't Judge Dredd. A person is innocent until proven guilty IN A COURT, so until a person is found guilty by a judge or jury, they're innocent. They're ALL innocent.

              SharquaydiusS This user is from outside of this forum
              SharquaydiusS This user is from outside of this forum
              Sharquaydius
              wrote last edited by
              #52

              @theleftistlawyer what about convicts and suspects on the run? Are they innocent?

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • AriaflameA Ariaflame

                @clintruin @connynasch @theleftistlawyer That doesn't address my comment. Did you vote last election? Are you acting to improve things? Or are you just giving up and trying to make others despair?

                Kid ManiaC This user is from outside of this forum
                Kid ManiaC This user is from outside of this forum
                Kid Mania
                wrote last edited by
                #53

                @ariaflame @connynasch @theleftistlawyer
                I am Canadian. I voted in my last election. YOUR president (are you American? If yes, then yes he is YOUR president) Wants to make my country your 51st state. I am not interested in playing pretend. Hope is not a plan. Please understand I pray I'm wrong. I really do. But naivete is dangerous. I'm sorry you find the truth depressing. So do I. If this explanation is not enough, your block button is right there. I suggest using it.

                AriaflameA 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • ⁂iwein⁂I ⁂iwein⁂

                  @joe @crazyeddie @theleftistlawyer for reference https://mstdn.social/@_L1vY_/115862935587928158

                  Joe AlexanderJ This user is from outside of this forum
                  Joe AlexanderJ This user is from outside of this forum
                  Joe Alexander
                  wrote last edited by
                  #54

                  @iwein @crazyeddie @theleftistlawyer lol wow you’re accusing me of being one of them because of what you said, there’s a difference? That’s pretty low, go ahead do what maga does, say the law is clear for one side only.

                  Joe AlexanderJ 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • ⁂iwein⁂I ⁂iwein⁂

                    @joe I think we agree on that, but I don't understand why you put the "no" there. It doesn't contradict anything I said, does it?

                    Joe AlexanderJ This user is from outside of this forum
                    Joe AlexanderJ This user is from outside of this forum
                    Joe Alexander
                    wrote last edited by
                    #55

                    @iwein you’re trying to say I’m pro ICE now. This is pointless.

                    ⁂iwein⁂I 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • Joe AlexanderJ Joe Alexander

                      @iwein @crazyeddie @theleftistlawyer lol wow you’re accusing me of being one of them because of what you said, there’s a difference? That’s pretty low, go ahead do what maga does, say the law is clear for one side only.

                      Joe AlexanderJ This user is from outside of this forum
                      Joe AlexanderJ This user is from outside of this forum
                      Joe Alexander
                      wrote last edited by
                      #56

                      @iwein @crazyeddie @theleftistlawyer I didn’t say defamation or anything, you’re really out of line here. I was just saying the presumption of innocence applies to all or it doesn’t apply at all. We disagreed so you said I’m defending ICE, you invoked Rittenhouse? I didn’t defend anyone or pass judgements in any way. This is disgraceful.

                      crazyeddieC ⁂iwein⁂I 2 Replies Last reply
                      0
                      • Sheryl WeikalT Sheryl Weikal

                        Gentle reminder that EVERYONE shot by ICE or the police is innocent. Every single one. Cops aren't Judge Dredd. A person is innocent until proven guilty IN A COURT, so until a person is found guilty by a judge or jury, they're innocent. They're ALL innocent.

                        huntingdonH This user is from outside of this forum
                        huntingdonH This user is from outside of this forum
                        huntingdon
                        wrote last edited by
                        #57

                        @theleftistlawyer

                        True, and often forgotten. But a victim needn't be innocent to have the right to be free from being targeted and murdered on American streets by masked gunmen, who have the president and his cabinet behind them.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • Joe AlexanderJ Joe Alexander

                          @iwein @crazyeddie @theleftistlawyer I didn’t say defamation or anything, you’re really out of line here. I was just saying the presumption of innocence applies to all or it doesn’t apply at all. We disagreed so you said I’m defending ICE, you invoked Rittenhouse? I didn’t defend anyone or pass judgements in any way. This is disgraceful.

                          crazyeddieC This user is from outside of this forum
                          crazyeddieC This user is from outside of this forum
                          crazyeddie
                          wrote last edited by
                          #58

                          @joe @iwein @theleftistlawyer This is why I didn't reply. Thanks for trying though.

                          When JD starts calling liberals slanderers for this we can both get a giggle out of it--then we can cry because we know why we're fucked.

                          Joe AlexanderJ 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • Kid ManiaC Kid Mania

                            @theleftistlawyer
                            Yes. This is what the law says.

                            Of course, the law also says no one is above the law.

                            That all ended on July 1st 2024 when the Supreme Court of the United States granted one man total immunity from prosecution. A man who could then, in turn, pardon anyone he feels like.

                            The American Constitution cannot exist side by side with one man who stands above it all...
                            ...Like A King.

                            ☠️ 🇺🇸 ☠️

                            Not trying hard enough 🦃L This user is from outside of this forum
                            Not trying hard enough 🦃L This user is from outside of this forum
                            Not trying hard enough 🦃
                            wrote last edited by
                            #59

                            @clintruin @theleftistlawyer
                            That's two different problems.

                            Not being held to the law, and being able to pardon anyone.

                            And it's with the position, it applies to whoever happens to the president.

                            Kid ManiaC 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • Joe AlexanderJ Joe Alexander

                              @iwein @crazyeddie @theleftistlawyer I didn’t say defamation or anything, you’re really out of line here. I was just saying the presumption of innocence applies to all or it doesn’t apply at all. We disagreed so you said I’m defending ICE, you invoked Rittenhouse? I didn’t defend anyone or pass judgements in any way. This is disgraceful.

                              ⁂iwein⁂I This user is from outside of this forum
                              ⁂iwein⁂I This user is from outside of this forum
                              ⁂iwein⁂
                              wrote last edited by
                              #60

                              @joe I'm not going to analyze this to death, but it seems to me we agree and you assume I'm accusing you of something incorrectly. Sorry if this was unclear, but this isn't about you at all.

                              @crazyeddie @theleftistlawyer

                              Joe AlexanderJ 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • crazyeddieC crazyeddie

                                @joe @iwein @theleftistlawyer This is why I didn't reply. Thanks for trying though.

                                When JD starts calling liberals slanderers for this we can both get a giggle out of it--then we can cry because we know why we're fucked.

                                Joe AlexanderJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                Joe AlexanderJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                Joe Alexander
                                wrote last edited by
                                #61

                                @crazyeddie @iwein @theleftistlawyer it’s just political hackery. They are saying it’s okay to take rights from some, if we don’t like them. And if you don’t want to be their kind of fascist then you’re somehow a monster.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • Joe AlexanderJ Joe Alexander

                                  @iwein you’re trying to say I’m pro ICE now. This is pointless.

                                  ⁂iwein⁂I This user is from outside of this forum
                                  ⁂iwein⁂I This user is from outside of this forum
                                  ⁂iwein⁂
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #62

                                  @joe no I'm not, and yes, this is pointless. Why don't you just stop?

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • ⁂iwein⁂I ⁂iwein⁂

                                    @joe I'm not going to analyze this to death, but it seems to me we agree and you assume I'm accusing you of something incorrectly. Sorry if this was unclear, but this isn't about you at all.

                                    @crazyeddie @theleftistlawyer

                                    Joe AlexanderJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                    Joe AlexanderJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                    Joe Alexander
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #63

                                    @iwein @crazyeddie @theleftistlawyer why would you invoke Rittenhouse? You’re accusing me of defending ICE.

                                    crazyeddieC 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • Joe AlexanderJ Joe Alexander

                                      @iwein @crazyeddie @theleftistlawyer why would you invoke Rittenhouse? You’re accusing me of defending ICE.

                                      crazyeddieC This user is from outside of this forum
                                      crazyeddieC This user is from outside of this forum
                                      crazyeddie
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #64

                                      @joe @iwein @theleftistlawyer The Mother Bones post basically says the same thing that I do except for noting that this, very pedantic, hanging on a threshold of legality definition of "innocent" is the very basis of it.

                                      The guy invading your home to kill you is "innocent".

                                      I really don't know why this person replied the way they did. I get the same sense you do from it. They say no. That's fine. I've been misunderstood also.

                                      ⁂iwein⁂I 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • Kid ManiaC Kid Mania

                                        @theleftistlawyer
                                        Yes. This is what the law says.

                                        Of course, the law also says no one is above the law.

                                        That all ended on July 1st 2024 when the Supreme Court of the United States granted one man total immunity from prosecution. A man who could then, in turn, pardon anyone he feels like.

                                        The American Constitution cannot exist side by side with one man who stands above it all...
                                        ...Like A King.

                                        ☠️ 🇺🇸 ☠️

                                        AquerciA This user is from outside of this forum
                                        AquerciA This user is from outside of this forum
                                        Aquerci
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #65

                                        @clintruin @theleftistlawyer

                                        What's his education? Did he ever go to school or what? Look at his face. It's the devil's.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • Not trying hard enough 🦃L Not trying hard enough 🦃

                                          @clintruin @theleftistlawyer
                                          That's two different problems.

                                          Not being held to the law, and being able to pardon anyone.

                                          And it's with the position, it applies to whoever happens to the president.

                                          Kid ManiaC This user is from outside of this forum
                                          Kid ManiaC This user is from outside of this forum
                                          Kid Mania
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #66

                                          @lonelystone @theleftistlawyer
                                          "And it's with the position, it applies to whoever happens to the president."

                                          True.

                                          "Not being held to the law, and being able to pardon anyone."

                                          Sure. But obviously you can see how the two things are connected...right?

                                          Not trying hard enough 🦃L 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0

                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          • First post
                                            Last post