Recently I've been somewhat fascinated by the concept of a Paccekabuddha. To vastly oversimplify it, it's a one whom independently achieves liberation without the aid of teachers; someone who finds the Dharma even in an age without buddhas (teachers) because the dharma exists all around, always, even when no one realizes it. They find it for themselves alone, not to teach it.I'm not really concerned with the exact doctrinal definitions of this concept or coming up with some stupid ass bootstraps brobuddhism. I don't think we're quite in an age without teachers or dharma or whatever you want to call it.But Christian, buddhist, whatever, I feel like everyone I encounter feels a certain... distance from those teachers. Their moralities don't match up, they know they have to ignore specific things, and add others. Almost everyone I know is dissatisfied with the general-public expression of their professed creed and it feels to me like they're being being forced (often against their will) into a negotiation with their spiritual beliefs.By which I mean: it feels like many people are on an individual path of liberation. They don't see a dharma in what their fellows profess, but aren't necessarily looking to spread something different. They're on their own, sorting through modern concerns, ancient texts, new texts, and the like. Essentially, on the path of an almost Paccekabuddha, just following whispers towards something they can live with that isn't orthodox, but still liberating. There's probably a more coherent and poignant thought there. I can't make it.