Skip to content
0
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Sketchy)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Wandering Adventure Party

  1. Home
  2. Canada
  3. When will America realize that this is not a joke. They'll be laughing right up to the goosestepping.

When will America realize that this is not a joke. They'll be laughing right up to the goosestepping.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Canada
canada
256 Posts 124 Posters 3 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • T turdas@suppo.fi

    I’m not a Mao fan I just think it’s a funny image (and unfortunately topical in today’s world).

    C This user is from outside of this forum
    C This user is from outside of this forum
    canadaplus@lemmy.sdf.org
    wrote last edited by
    #121

    “Just joking bro”

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
    • R rarsamx@lemmy.ca

      Venezuela should have been the line. Want to make it Greenland? So, they can take mexico, Cuba?

      Each inch they take is too much. They have proven that they are following the Fascist guidebook.

      Venezuela is the first step. Same as Hitler with Poland.

      spacecowboy@lemmy.caS This user is from outside of this forum
      spacecowboy@lemmy.caS This user is from outside of this forum
      spacecowboy@lemmy.ca
      wrote last edited by
      #122

      Poland was the last step, which is what started WWII. I think you mean Czechoslovakia (or maybe the Rhineland) was the first step.

      R 1 Reply Last reply
      20
      • R raskolnikovsaxe@lemmy.ca

        Greenland is arguably under NATO protection. Cuba is not, and there are in fact many groups of Cubans in the US who support an invasion of Cuba, I’m not going to get involved with that bullshit.

        As for Mexico, I’m saddened by the lack of an informal alliance between the two countries. As much as I wish it weren’t so, I’ve not seen any indication from Mexico that they would stand with us. An invasion of Mexico would be an enormous step that would justify ramping up sanctioning behavior, but for me, as a Canadian, the line in the sand should be Greenland. Meaning if Greenland is ever directly attacked, we are in a war stance. We cut off everything to the US, sell all the Tbonds, nationalize all strategic resources (oil, media, telecom, water, hydro, food, potash, critical minerals), seize assists and nationalize all patents. I would recommend we also look for any alliance with China.

        THAT’S what I mean by a line in the sand. We cut them off and dig in.

        Edit… Hey if you disagree tell me why, stand up for yourself don’t just downvote and move on.

        spacecowboy@lemmy.caS This user is from outside of this forum
        spacecowboy@lemmy.caS This user is from outside of this forum
        spacecowboy@lemmy.ca
        wrote last edited by
        #123

        Why would you term Greenland a protectorate? It’s the territory of an ally.

        It saddens me that Americans seem to be incapable of understanding even the concept of an ally.

        R 1 Reply Last reply
        4
        • R raskolnikovsaxe@lemmy.ca

          Greenland is arguably under NATO protection. Cuba is not, and there are in fact many groups of Cubans in the US who support an invasion of Cuba, I’m not going to get involved with that bullshit.

          As for Mexico, I’m saddened by the lack of an informal alliance between the two countries. As much as I wish it weren’t so, I’ve not seen any indication from Mexico that they would stand with us. An invasion of Mexico would be an enormous step that would justify ramping up sanctioning behavior, but for me, as a Canadian, the line in the sand should be Greenland. Meaning if Greenland is ever directly attacked, we are in a war stance. We cut off everything to the US, sell all the Tbonds, nationalize all strategic resources (oil, media, telecom, water, hydro, food, potash, critical minerals), seize assists and nationalize all patents. I would recommend we also look for any alliance with China.

          THAT’S what I mean by a line in the sand. We cut them off and dig in.

          Edit… Hey if you disagree tell me why, stand up for yourself don’t just downvote and move on.

          R This user is from outside of this forum
          R This user is from outside of this forum
          rarsamx@lemmy.ca
          wrote last edited by rarsamx@lemmy.ca
          #124

          I am Mexican Canadian.

          Mexico hasn’t forgotten about all the stolen territory. Yes, they call it sale and secession and whatever, it was stolen.

          If I put a gun to your head and ask you to sell me a property you have for $10. You are going to do it. I’d say I purchased it. I’m sure you’ll say I stole it.

          So, why do disagree?

          Because of the wise reflection of “first they came for the…”

          Well. If we don’t stand against them taking over Venezuela, who is going to stand with us when they try to take over us (Greenland, Canada, Mexico and the rest)

          The manifest Destiny is no joke.

          R G 2 Replies Last reply
          12
          • R raskolnikovsaxe@lemmy.ca

            I’m not sure about this. They’ve got a more than capable military.

            But I’m willing to find out where their limit is. Militarily, I suspect it starts at a protracted war of attrition with a determined enemy that looks exactly like them and who pops in and out of unassailable and impassable northern boreal forests and muskeg swamps. Or hides in plain sight in the middle of Toronto. Or hops over the immense border to wreak havoc. No one would be safe, ever.

            Economically, I think cutting off hydro, oil and potash would have an enormous effect on their comfort level. For lasting damage, nationalize all strategic resources and seize assets and companies. Raze them if threatened, starting with US assets. Nationalize all IP and patents. Sell all US government debt and send the interest rates sky high.

            The weakness the US has is that they are doing this for more power and a comfortable life. They AIM to survive it. Frankly at a certain point I don’t care about that. Our fight is existential, and we have given up on a vision of life after. What matters at that point is the here and now, and that’s it.

            spacecowboy@lemmy.caS This user is from outside of this forum
            spacecowboy@lemmy.caS This user is from outside of this forum
            spacecowboy@lemmy.ca
            wrote last edited by
            #125

            The biggest weakness of the US is that Americans hate one another. At the current time another civil war in the US isn’t in my best interests. But future events might change that.

            Also, I don’t want to fight Americans in the streets of Toronto. I would be willing to fight Americans in the streets of American cities tho. The American concept of war is something that happens “over there”. How would Americans handle it if war wasn’t just some drone video of a boat in the Caribbean getting hit by a missile?

            Hopefully it won’t come to that. But people obsess over troop counts a little too much and don’t think at all about the weakness inherent in American culture. That weakness obviously led to Trump and the general decline of the US. That decline can be either mitigated or exploited. We’ll just have to see how it goes.

            1 Reply Last reply
            4
            • D deiceamerica@lemmy.world

              The only way it’s stops is when the blood lust they seek comes home to roost.

              T This user is from outside of this forum
              T This user is from outside of this forum
              teppichbrand@feddit.org
              wrote last edited by teppichbrand@feddit.org
              #126

              Covid didn’t stop them when it was already in their homes destroying their lungs. This cult scares me, you can’t fight the insanity, it makes them stronger if you do. What do we do?

              R 1 Reply Last reply
              3
              • R raskolnikovsaxe@lemmy.ca

                Canadians: Greenland must be the line in the sand. Non negotiable.

                DylanMc6 [any, any]D This user is from outside of this forum
                DylanMc6 [any, any]D This user is from outside of this forum
                DylanMc6 [any, any]
                wrote last edited by
                #127

                We need socialism

                C P 2 Replies Last reply
                12
                • R raskolnikovsaxe@lemmy.ca

                  Canadians: Greenland must be the line in the sand. Non negotiable.

                  O This user is from outside of this forum
                  O This user is from outside of this forum
                  oshaghennessey@lemmy.world
                  wrote last edited by
                  #128

                  We know it’s not a joke. The three most populated cities in the US are in deep blue states and full of people who don’t want this. For everyone in those cities, it would take days and hundreds, if not thousands of dollars, to travel to the White House. Most of us are behind on rent, have had our cars repossessed, don’t make a living wage, don’t have healthcare, and have unsustainable credit card debt.

                  Outside of a very vocal minority, the American people are overwhelmingly united around the fact that we don’t want this to happen.

                  However, the American people aren’t in control of the American government, and the American government are overwhelmingly united around corporate interests.

                  T M 2 Replies Last reply
                  34
                  • spacecowboy@lemmy.caS spacecowboy@lemmy.ca

                    Why would you term Greenland a protectorate? It’s the territory of an ally.

                    It saddens me that Americans seem to be incapable of understanding even the concept of an ally.

                    R This user is from outside of this forum
                    R This user is from outside of this forum
                    raskolnikovsaxe@lemmy.ca
                    wrote last edited by
                    #129

                    I meant that it is under the NATO umbrella. I have no interest, and I would not support, any Canadian involvement in Greenland beyond our help and support in the face of American aggression.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    2
                    • K kent_eh@lemmy.ca

                      and no single person can solve the problem.

                      That’s a big part of their problem. They keep thinking about individual actions instead of coming together and acting as a group toward a common goal.

                      V This user is from outside of this forum
                      V This user is from outside of this forum
                      velindora@lemmy.cafe
                      wrote last edited by
                      #130

                      Yeah well we had “No Kings” and people came together, yet nothing happened. A few million people showed up and then went home.

                      K W 2 Replies Last reply
                      2
                      • V velindora@lemmy.cafe

                        Yeah well we had “No Kings” and people came together, yet nothing happened. A few million people showed up and then went home.

                        K This user is from outside of this forum
                        K This user is from outside of this forum
                        kent_eh@lemmy.ca
                        wrote last edited by
                        #131

                        and then went home.

                        That’s part of the problem.

                        Effective protesting isn’t a “one and done” thing.

                        V 1 Reply Last reply
                        7
                        • R rarsamx@lemmy.ca

                          I am Mexican Canadian.

                          Mexico hasn’t forgotten about all the stolen territory. Yes, they call it sale and secession and whatever, it was stolen.

                          If I put a gun to your head and ask you to sell me a property you have for $10. You are going to do it. I’d say I purchased it. I’m sure you’ll say I stole it.

                          So, why do disagree?

                          Because of the wise reflection of “first they came for the…”

                          Well. If we don’t stand against them taking over Venezuela, who is going to stand with us when they try to take over us (Greenland, Canada, Mexico and the rest)

                          The manifest Destiny is no joke.

                          R This user is from outside of this forum
                          R This user is from outside of this forum
                          raskolnikovsaxe@lemmy.ca
                          wrote last edited by
                          #132

                          I agree on everything you’ve said.

                          If I may ask, and forgive my ignorance: Am I wrong about Mexico? Is there any room for mutual support? Or is Canada generally an afterthought in Mexico, or worse, not trusted?

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          2
                          • K kent_eh@lemmy.ca

                            and then went home.

                            That’s part of the problem.

                            Effective protesting isn’t a “one and done” thing.

                            V This user is from outside of this forum
                            V This user is from outside of this forum
                            velindora@lemmy.cafe
                            wrote last edited by
                            #133

                            I agree. And that is why the US is done for. No one is willing to stay until we get what we want… and want is subjective.

                            Best to pack up and move to another country if they can.

                            B 1 Reply Last reply
                            2
                            • B bagsy@lemmy.world

                              And you think action will be easier if you wait longer? You are wrong, things are only going to get more difficult.

                              Facism is a cancer. You cant ignore it or reason with it, or hope it goes away. The only option is to take the terrible medicine and fight, now.

                              _ This user is from outside of this forum
                              _ This user is from outside of this forum
                              _chris@lemmy.world
                              wrote last edited by
                              #134

                              Well, yeah. It will be perhaps not easier if you wait for a mass of discontent or an inciting incident, but it will be winnable. You can’t fight alone. Yes, it’s going to be a fight and a challenge, but we have to convince the masses that the status quo is not normal any more, and convince the notoriously easy going and anti violent crowd to understand that violence is necessary. If you fight too early, you’ll get all the centrists against you as well - and we can’t have a two front fight.

                              Groups of like minded individuals are already beginning to form. Those will naturally coalesce when the time is right.

                              What immediate, terrible medicine do you propose? I’m legitimately interested.

                              B 1 Reply Last reply
                              1
                              • R raskolnikovsaxe@lemmy.ca

                                Greenland is arguably under NATO protection. Cuba is not, and there are in fact many groups of Cubans in the US who support an invasion of Cuba, I’m not going to get involved with that bullshit.

                                As for Mexico, I’m saddened by the lack of an informal alliance between the two countries. As much as I wish it weren’t so, I’ve not seen any indication from Mexico that they would stand with us. An invasion of Mexico would be an enormous step that would justify ramping up sanctioning behavior, but for me, as a Canadian, the line in the sand should be Greenland. Meaning if Greenland is ever directly attacked, we are in a war stance. We cut off everything to the US, sell all the Tbonds, nationalize all strategic resources (oil, media, telecom, water, hydro, food, potash, critical minerals), seize assists and nationalize all patents. I would recommend we also look for any alliance with China.

                                THAT’S what I mean by a line in the sand. We cut them off and dig in.

                                Edit… Hey if you disagree tell me why, stand up for yourself don’t just downvote and move on.

                                V This user is from outside of this forum
                                V This user is from outside of this forum
                                vane@lemmy.world
                                wrote last edited by vane@lemmy.world
                                #135

                                US is in NATO so it doesn’t matter, to be honest NATO without US doesn’t exists because it’s EU, UK, US and Canada, that’s why EU wants Canada in and to be honest Canada should join to keep itself inside old union. US is heading towards BRICS right now.

                                C 1 Reply Last reply
                                4
                                • O oshaghennessey@lemmy.world

                                  We know it’s not a joke. The three most populated cities in the US are in deep blue states and full of people who don’t want this. For everyone in those cities, it would take days and hundreds, if not thousands of dollars, to travel to the White House. Most of us are behind on rent, have had our cars repossessed, don’t make a living wage, don’t have healthcare, and have unsustainable credit card debt.

                                  Outside of a very vocal minority, the American people are overwhelmingly united around the fact that we don’t want this to happen.

                                  However, the American people aren’t in control of the American government, and the American government are overwhelmingly united around corporate interests.

                                  T This user is from outside of this forum
                                  T This user is from outside of this forum
                                  thanksobama@sh.itjust.works
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #136

                                  There is still hope…

                                  T circav@lemmy.caC 2 Replies Last reply
                                  18
                                  • M mbech@feddit.dk

                                    The comment said nothing about the ban having to be this instant. They said to stop all trade. That could just as well mean, take the necessary steps to stop all trade as feasibly fast as possible. How long do you think it would take for China to be able to export computer hardware directly to the EU if the EU said tomorrow “As soon as you can supply hardware, we will stop all trade with USA”? China is the champion of accelerated manufacturing, they’d be supplying us in a couple of months.

                                    There already is open source software solution for by FAR most software that is used. Most companies don’t actually need proprietary software from USA, they can switch very quickly, especially if they get a deadline in a month to switch everything away from Linux, 'cause then the profits are on the line.

                                    R This user is from outside of this forum
                                    R This user is from outside of this forum
                                    ranzispa@mander.xyz
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #137

                                    Do you know European funds can not be used to hire Iranians because the US demanded so? I know it because I was hiring an Iranian person until I figured I could not.

                                    Open source software does not cover most needs, and server capacity is mostly in the US. I doubt you can switch away in one month from us software, do you have open source software for safe information storage and retrieval of patient data in hospitals that complies with the regulations of all 27 states of the EU? While China can produce things, they do not have strong chip designers. If they were to produce good enough chips I guess they’d keep them for internal use for quite a while.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    1
                                    • DylanMc6 [any, any]D DylanMc6 [any, any]

                                      We need socialism

                                      C This user is from outside of this forum
                                      C This user is from outside of this forum
                                      corngood@lemmy.ml
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #138

                                      True, but if we’re going to put our people ahead of profits for American corporations, we’re definitely going to need allies to guarantee our sovereignty.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      1
                                      • _ _chris@lemmy.world

                                        Well, yeah. It will be perhaps not easier if you wait for a mass of discontent or an inciting incident, but it will be winnable. You can’t fight alone. Yes, it’s going to be a fight and a challenge, but we have to convince the masses that the status quo is not normal any more, and convince the notoriously easy going and anti violent crowd to understand that violence is necessary. If you fight too early, you’ll get all the centrists against you as well - and we can’t have a two front fight.

                                        Groups of like minded individuals are already beginning to form. Those will naturally coalesce when the time is right.

                                        What immediate, terrible medicine do you propose? I’m legitimately interested.

                                        B This user is from outside of this forum
                                        B This user is from outside of this forum
                                        bagsy@lemmy.world
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #139

                                        Thats the thing, I dont know what the medicine should be.

                                        I feel like we are waiting either for an incident like you suggest, or a leader who is able to rally the un-interested, un-motivated, and burned out masses. The left does not have their super star yet.

                                        _ 1 Reply Last reply
                                        1
                                        • W wonderingwanderer

                                          Some cancers are terminal/inoperable…

                                          B This user is from outside of this forum
                                          B This user is from outside of this forum
                                          bagsy@lemmy.world
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #140

                                          Thats true, but i dint think thats the case here. Regimes can always be changed. Sure it might take a couple decades, but even rome eventually fell.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          1

                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          • First post
                                            Last post