Skip to content
0
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Sketchy)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Wandering Adventure Party

  1. Home
  2. PC Gaming
  3. Australian anti-porn group claims responsibility for Steam's new censorship rules in victory against 'porn sick brain rotted pedo gamer fetishists', and things only get weirder from there

Australian anti-porn group claims responsibility for Steam's new censorship rules in victory against 'porn sick brain rotted pedo gamer fetishists', and things only get weirder from there

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved PC Gaming
pcgaming
164 Posts 82 Posters 4 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • π™²πš‘πšŠπš’πš›πš–πšŠπš— π™ΌπšŽπš˜πš C π™²πš‘πšŠπš’πš›πš–πšŠπš— π™ΌπšŽπš˜πš 

    Porn made with the willing consent of all parties involved, where everyone is compensated appropriately. No harm = no ethical problems as far as I’m concerned. Most big studios these days make sure of this. But there have also been pioneers that push the bar further up (e.g. Lustery, Ersties or Erika Lust).

    squid64@lemmy.caS This user is from outside of this forum
    squid64@lemmy.caS This user is from outside of this forum
    squid64@lemmy.ca
    wrote on last edited by
    #137

    So if a father and daughter consent is that ethical now?

    π™²πš‘πšŠπš’πš›πš–πšŠπš— π™ΌπšŽπš˜πš C 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • I inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world
      This post did not contain any content.
      C This user is from outside of this forum
      C This user is from outside of this forum
      cyberflunk@lemmy.world
      wrote on last edited by
      #138

      Collective shout finacials year: 2024 revenue: 458043 employee_expenses: 107000 other_expenses: 215488 net_surplus: 135555 employees: total_fte: 2 full_time: 0 part_time: 1 casual: 4 volunteers: 15 donations_and_bequests: 389800 government_grants: 0 commercial_income: 0 expense_to_revenue_ratio: β€œ70.4%” average_expense_per_employee: 39400

      Leadership

      • name: Melinda Tankard Reist role: Founder, Movement Director public_socials:

        • Twitter: @MelTankardReist
        • Instagram: @collective.shout public_email_address: Not publicly listed salary: Not publicly listed
      • name: Caitlin Roper role: Campaigns Manager public_socials:

        • Instagram: @collective.shout public_email_address: Not publicly listed salary: Not publicly listed
      • name: Renee Chopping role: Campaigns Strategy public_socials:

        • LinkedIn public_email_address: r******@collectiveshout.org salary: Not publicly listed
      • name: Lyn Swanson Kennedy role: Campaigns Strategy public_socials:

        • Instagram: @collective.shout public_email_address: Not publicly listed salary: Not publicly listed
      • name: Coralie Alison role: Movement Operations Manager public_socials:

        • Twitter: @CoralieAlison
        • Instagram: @collective.shout public_email_address: Not publicly listed salary: Not publicly listed
      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • I inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world
        This post did not contain any content.
        C This user is from outside of this forum
        C This user is from outside of this forum
        cyberflunk@lemmy.world
        wrote on last edited by
        #139
        Collective shout finacials
        year: 2024
        revenue: 458043
        employee_expenses: 107000
        other_expenses: 215488
        net_surplus: 135555
        employees: 
          total_fte: 2
          full_time: 0
          part_time: 1
          casual: 4
        volunteers: 15
        donations_and_bequests: 389800
        government_grants: 0
        commercial_income: 0
        expense_to_revenue_ratio: "70.4%"
        average_expense_per_employee: 39400
        
        Leadership
        - name: Melinda Tankard Reist
          role: Founder, Movement Director
          public_socials:
            - Twitter: @MelTankardReist
            - Instagram: @collective.shout
          public_email_address: Not publicly listed
          salary: Not publicly listed
        
        - name: Caitlin Roper
          role: Campaigns Manager
          public_socials:
            - Instagram: @collective.shout
          public_email_address: Not publicly listed
          salary: Not publicly listed
        
        - name: Renee Chopping
          role: Campaigns Strategy
          public_socials:
            - LinkedIn
          public_email_address: r******@collectiveshout.org
          salary: Not publicly listed
        
        - name: Lyn Swanson Kennedy
          role: Campaigns Strategy
          public_socials:
            - Instagram: @collective.shout
          public_email_address: Not publicly listed
          salary: Not publicly listed
        
        - name: Coralie Alison
          role: Movement Operations Manager
          public_socials:
            - Twitter: @CoralieAlison
            - Instagram: @collective.shout
          public_email_address: Not publicly listed
          salary: Not publicly listed
        
        1 Reply Last reply
        4
        • π™²πš‘πšŠπš’πš›πš–πšŠπš— π™ΌπšŽπš˜πš C π™²πš‘πšŠπš’πš›πš–πšŠπš— π™ΌπšŽπš˜πš 

          Link Preview Image
          Pornography and Sexual Aggression: Can Meta-Analysis Find a Link? - PubMed

          Whether pornography contributes to sexual aggression in real life has been the subject of dozens of studies over multiple decades. Nevertheless, scholars have not come to a consensus about whether effects are real. The current meta-analysis examined experimental, correlational, and population studie …

          favicon

          PubMed (pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov)

          Population studies suggested that increased availability of pornography is associated with reduced sexual aggression at the population level

          GloomyG This user is from outside of this forum
          GloomyG This user is from outside of this forum
          Gloomy
          wrote on last edited by gloomy@mander.xyz
          #140

          More studies with improved practices and preregistration would be welcome.

          Next sentence

          Also:

          Whether pornography contributes to sexual aggression in real life has been the subject of dozens of studies over multiple decades. Nevertheless, scholars have not come to a consensus about whether effects are real.

          Also also this study has nothing to do with your claim. Its not about porn preventing violent behaviour, it’s about whether porn causes it or not.

          π™²πš‘πšŠπš’πš›πš–πšŠπš— π™ΌπšŽπš˜πš C 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • K kadaverin0@lemmy.dbzer0.com

            Every accusation is a confession for these sex-negative types. The guy who shrieks the loudest about gender non-conforming people being abominable and vile is usually found 6 months later in Thailand smoking hash and hiring kathoey escorts.

            Z This user is from outside of this forum
            Z This user is from outside of this forum
            zink@programming.dev
            wrote on last edited by
            #141

            Absolutely, and the scary part to me is how that projection includes LGBT folks also being child predators all the damn time.

            It’s like they are a bunch of bisexual pedophiles who are repressed and angry, and they get jealous when they see other people giving in to the same desires. Or, as we see all the time, they assume somebody β€œgiving in” to their homosexuality or gender dysphoria is also β€œgiving in” to their pedophilia.

            1 Reply Last reply
            3
            • squid64@lemmy.caS squid64@lemmy.ca

              So if a father and daughter consent is that ethical now?

              π™²πš‘πšŠπš’πš›πš–πšŠπš— π™ΌπšŽπš˜πš C This user is from outside of this forum
              π™²πš‘πšŠπš’πš›πš–πšŠπš— π™ΌπšŽπš˜πš C This user is from outside of this forum
              π™²πš‘πšŠπš’πš›πš–πšŠπš— π™ΌπšŽπš˜πš 
              wrote on last edited by
              #142

              There is a clear power disparity between a father and a daughter. It’s debatable if the daughter could even realistically consent in that case.

              But a depiction of it in porn is in my view not inherently unethical. I can disapprove of it personally, but that doesn’t mean we should start banning it based on feelings of inappropriateness.

              We depict murder and violence in movies and video games too. Actual murder is of course not exactly ethical, but we have no problem accepting it in a movie, because nobody is actually being murdered. You might not like to watch a movie like Saw or something (I personally don’t), but it doesn’t make the movie itself unethical. To me, porn is no different. There’s a clear separation between fiction and reality.

              Where imo a line is crossed, is if said media actually makes a clear effort to promote these acts IRL. But that’s not the case here.

              squid64@lemmy.caS 1 Reply Last reply
              1
              • π™²πš‘πšŠπš’πš›πš–πšŠπš— π™ΌπšŽπš˜πš C π™²πš‘πšŠπš’πš›πš–πšŠπš— π™ΌπšŽπš˜πš 

                There is a clear power disparity between a father and a daughter. It’s debatable if the daughter could even realistically consent in that case.

                But a depiction of it in porn is in my view not inherently unethical. I can disapprove of it personally, but that doesn’t mean we should start banning it based on feelings of inappropriateness.

                We depict murder and violence in movies and video games too. Actual murder is of course not exactly ethical, but we have no problem accepting it in a movie, because nobody is actually being murdered. You might not like to watch a movie like Saw or something (I personally don’t), but it doesn’t make the movie itself unethical. To me, porn is no different. There’s a clear separation between fiction and reality.

                Where imo a line is crossed, is if said media actually makes a clear effort to promote these acts IRL. But that’s not the case here.

                squid64@lemmy.caS This user is from outside of this forum
                squid64@lemmy.caS This user is from outside of this forum
                squid64@lemmy.ca
                wrote on last edited by squid64@lemmy.ca
                #143

                What if the daughter is in their 20s or 30s? As for depiction, yes there are depiction of violence and murder in movies and games but it is not done in a way that glorify it and most people don’t watch it with thirst for murder and violence and they don’t get off to it either. The problem with porn is it’s made with that in mind, it only exist for people to lust after and get off to it. In many circumstances they are always trying to look for more extreme content because the normal stuff isn’t as satisfying anymore. It has been shown to affect the same area of the brain as meth and cocaine. It doesn’t cause harm physically but mentally. Sure a thing existing doesn’t make it inherently wrong but it more the effect it has on the people consuming the content. It’s also why drugs are bad. You could say the drug is just a plant, that it’s natural and that there is nothing wrong with that plant existing. But the problem is the effect that plant has on people who consume it. And I am not against you drawing something in private at home or anything, in fact I am strictly against spying and mass surveillance and people should all have privacy in their own home and place they live. So whatever you do on your own time by yourself alone I don’t care but the problem comes when that thing gets shared with others and affects them negatively.

                π™²πš‘πšŠπš’πš›πš–πšŠπš— π™ΌπšŽπš˜πš C 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • GloomyG Gloomy

                  More studies with improved practices and preregistration would be welcome.

                  Next sentence

                  Also:

                  Whether pornography contributes to sexual aggression in real life has been the subject of dozens of studies over multiple decades. Nevertheless, scholars have not come to a consensus about whether effects are real.

                  Also also this study has nothing to do with your claim. Its not about porn preventing violent behaviour, it’s about whether porn causes it or not.

                  π™²πš‘πšŠπš’πš›πš–πšŠπš— π™ΌπšŽπš˜πš C This user is from outside of this forum
                  π™²πš‘πšŠπš’πš›πš–πšŠπš— π™ΌπšŽπš˜πš C This user is from outside of this forum
                  π™²πš‘πšŠπš’πš›πš–πšŠπš— π™ΌπšŽπš˜πš 
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #144

                  This is not contradictory.

                  The meta-study says that pornography contributing to sexual aggression is not proven. Meaning, it doesn’t make it worse.

                  Meanwhile the population study seems to suggest porn usage reduces sexual aggression, or is at least correlated with it.

                  GloomyG 2 Replies Last reply
                  0
                  • L lumisal@lemmy.world

                    They might be referring to the 90s, post Mortal Kombat.

                    A lot of games got blood censorship in a lot of countries.

                    Even before that I know some games like Contra they replaced the infected β€œhumans” with robots.

                    E This user is from outside of this forum
                    E This user is from outside of this forum
                    etterra@discuss.online
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #145

                    I am really fucking old, to be fair, but every time I hear about violent video games being censored it’s Australia.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    1
                    • D duamerthrax@lemmy.world

                      Always has.

                      Link Preview Image
                      Australia's 'small breast' ban

                      Australia has vowed to fight child exploitation β€” but is stamping out images of "small-breasted" women really the right way to do it?

                      favicon

                      The Week (theweek.com)

                      S This user is from outside of this forum
                      S This user is from outside of this forum
                      some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #146

                      Talk about braindead / misguided legislature.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      1
                      • π™²πš‘πšŠπš’πš›πš–πšŠπš— π™ΌπšŽπš˜πš C π™²πš‘πšŠπš’πš›πš–πšŠπš— π™ΌπšŽπš˜πš 

                        This is not contradictory.

                        The meta-study says that pornography contributing to sexual aggression is not proven. Meaning, it doesn’t make it worse.

                        Meanwhile the population study seems to suggest porn usage reduces sexual aggression, or is at least correlated with it.

                        GloomyG This user is from outside of this forum
                        GloomyG This user is from outside of this forum
                        Gloomy
                        wrote on last edited by gloomy@mander.xyz
                        #147

                        Meanwhile the population study seems to suggest porn usage reduces sexual aggression, or is at least correlated with it.

                        The last sentence of the abstract (More studies with improved practices and preregistration would be welcome.) seems to be adressing this. In the study itself they say:

                        A third group of studies considers relationships between pornography consumption and sexual violence at the population level (e.g., Diamond et al., 2011; Gentry, 1991). In such studies, changes in the population rate of sexual crimes are associated with changes in the availability of pornography, often due to changes in the law. Cross-nationally, most (though not all) such studies suggest that pornography consumption is correlated with reductions in sexual violence. However, such data are correlational in nature, and third variables at the societal level may also be responsible for these patterns.

                        You said, at the start of our dialog, that:

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • π™²πš‘πšŠπš’πš›πš–πšŠπš— π™ΌπšŽπš˜πš C π™²πš‘πšŠπš’πš›πš–πšŠπš— π™ΌπšŽπš˜πš 

                          This is not contradictory.

                          The meta-study says that pornography contributing to sexual aggression is not proven. Meaning, it doesn’t make it worse.

                          Meanwhile the population study seems to suggest porn usage reduces sexual aggression, or is at least correlated with it.

                          GloomyG This user is from outside of this forum
                          GloomyG This user is from outside of this forum
                          Gloomy
                          wrote on last edited by gloomy@mander.xyz
                          #148

                          Meanwhile the population study seems to suggest porn usage reduces sexual aggression, or is at least correlated with it.

                          The last sentence of the abstract (More studies with improved practices and preregistration would be welcome.) seems to be adressing this. In the study itself they say:

                          A third group of studies considers relationships between pornography consumption and sexual violence at the population level (e.g., Diamond et al., 2011; Gentry, 1991). In such studies, changes in the population rate of sexual crimes are associated with changes in the availability of pornography, often due to changes in the law. Cross-nationally, most (though not all) such studies suggest that pornography consumption is correlated with reductions in sexual violence. However, such data are correlational in nature, and third variables at the societal level may also be responsible for these patterns.

                          You said, at the start of our dialog, that:

                          Regardless, there are tons of studies showing that consuming this kind of porn actually helps prevent people from acting on these fantasies

                          β€œThis kind” refers to violent porn, i suppose? Because the study states that:

                          Our meta-analytic results reveal no relationship between exposure to nonviolent pornography and sexual aggression.

                          So they are not talking about β€œthis kind” of porn.

                          π™²πš‘πšŠπš’πš›πš–πšŠπš— π™ΌπšŽπš˜πš C 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • squid64@lemmy.caS squid64@lemmy.ca

                            What if the daughter is in their 20s or 30s? As for depiction, yes there are depiction of violence and murder in movies and games but it is not done in a way that glorify it and most people don’t watch it with thirst for murder and violence and they don’t get off to it either. The problem with porn is it’s made with that in mind, it only exist for people to lust after and get off to it. In many circumstances they are always trying to look for more extreme content because the normal stuff isn’t as satisfying anymore. It has been shown to affect the same area of the brain as meth and cocaine. It doesn’t cause harm physically but mentally. Sure a thing existing doesn’t make it inherently wrong but it more the effect it has on the people consuming the content. It’s also why drugs are bad. You could say the drug is just a plant, that it’s natural and that there is nothing wrong with that plant existing. But the problem is the effect that plant has on people who consume it. And I am not against you drawing something in private at home or anything, in fact I am strictly against spying and mass surveillance and people should all have privacy in their own home and place they live. So whatever you do on your own time by yourself alone I don’t care but the problem comes when that thing gets shared with others and affects them negatively.

                            π™²πš‘πšŠπš’πš›πš–πšŠπš— π™ΌπšŽπš˜πš C This user is from outside of this forum
                            π™²πš‘πšŠπš’πš›πš–πšŠπš— π™ΌπšŽπš˜πš C This user is from outside of this forum
                            π™²πš‘πšŠπš’πš›πš–πšŠπš— π™ΌπšŽπš˜πš 
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #149

                            We don’t have a specific cordoned off section for meth and cocaine in our brains. Many things trigger those areas of the brain, including some pretty innocuous stuff.

                            Porn isn’t physically addictive like meth and cocaine. It can be psychologically addictive though, but that goes for a lot of things out there.

                            Stuff like meth and cocaine can actually alter your brain, porn does not.

                            Anyone can develop an unhealthy relationship with porn, but that goes for just about anything out there.

                            squid64@lemmy.caS 2 Replies Last reply
                            1
                            • GloomyG Gloomy

                              Meanwhile the population study seems to suggest porn usage reduces sexual aggression, or is at least correlated with it.

                              The last sentence of the abstract (More studies with improved practices and preregistration would be welcome.) seems to be adressing this. In the study itself they say:

                              A third group of studies considers relationships between pornography consumption and sexual violence at the population level (e.g., Diamond et al., 2011; Gentry, 1991). In such studies, changes in the population rate of sexual crimes are associated with changes in the availability of pornography, often due to changes in the law. Cross-nationally, most (though not all) such studies suggest that pornography consumption is correlated with reductions in sexual violence. However, such data are correlational in nature, and third variables at the societal level may also be responsible for these patterns.

                              You said, at the start of our dialog, that:

                              Regardless, there are tons of studies showing that consuming this kind of porn actually helps prevent people from acting on these fantasies

                              β€œThis kind” refers to violent porn, i suppose? Because the study states that:

                              Our meta-analytic results reveal no relationship between exposure to nonviolent pornography and sexual aggression.

                              So they are not talking about β€œthis kind” of porn.

                              π™²πš‘πšŠπš’πš›πš–πšŠπš— π™ΌπšŽπš˜πš C This user is from outside of this forum
                              π™²πš‘πšŠπš’πš›πš–πšŠπš— π™ΌπšŽπš˜πš C This user is from outside of this forum
                              π™²πš‘πšŠπš’πš›πš–πšŠπš— π™ΌπšŽπš˜πš 
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #150

                              The meta analysis addresses porn in general. That includes fetishized content like violent or β€œtaboo” pornography. It states there’s no evidence that it makes sexual aggression more prevalent, and that population studies show that it’s at least correlated with a reduction instead.

                              We can nitpick the wording all day long, but ultimately I think the takeaway is that there’s no evidence that it has negative effects, and there’s at least some evidence that suggests it has positive effects.

                              GloomyG 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • π™²πš‘πšŠπš’πš›πš–πšŠπš— π™ΌπšŽπš˜πš C π™²πš‘πšŠπš’πš›πš–πšŠπš— π™ΌπšŽπš˜πš 

                                The meta analysis addresses porn in general. That includes fetishized content like violent or β€œtaboo” pornography. It states there’s no evidence that it makes sexual aggression more prevalent, and that population studies show that it’s at least correlated with a reduction instead.

                                We can nitpick the wording all day long, but ultimately I think the takeaway is that there’s no evidence that it has negative effects, and there’s at least some evidence that suggests it has positive effects.

                                GloomyG This user is from outside of this forum
                                GloomyG This user is from outside of this forum
                                Gloomy
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #151

                                Violent pornography was weakly correlated with sexual aggression, although the current evidence was unable to distinguish between a selection effect as compared to a socialization effect.

                                If anything, this points towards the opposite conclusion. And that is with zero nitpicking.

                                π™²πš‘πšŠπš’πš›πš–πšŠπš— π™ΌπšŽπš˜πš C 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • GloomyG Gloomy

                                  Violent pornography was weakly correlated with sexual aggression, although the current evidence was unable to distinguish between a selection effect as compared to a socialization effect.

                                  If anything, this points towards the opposite conclusion. And that is with zero nitpicking.

                                  π™²πš‘πšŠπš’πš›πš–πšŠπš— π™ΌπšŽπš˜πš C This user is from outside of this forum
                                  π™²πš‘πšŠπš’πš›πš–πšŠπš— π™ΌπšŽπš˜πš C This user is from outside of this forum
                                  π™²πš‘πšŠπš’πš›πš–πšŠπš— π™ΌπšŽπš˜πš 
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #152

                                  The inability to distinguish between selection and socialization means there’s no evidence for a causal link. At best, it suggests that people who commit sexual aggression generally like porn featuring it more, but even that is apparently a weak correlation apparently.

                                  GloomyG 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • E ebber@lemmings.world

                                    It’s the wrong way to go about it though. Private companies should not dictate legality and morality.

                                    M This user is from outside of this forum
                                    M This user is from outside of this forum
                                    Melmi
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #153

                                    I wouldn’t mind if Valve did. It’s the unaccountable payment processors deciding morality that’s spooky, because there’s no meaningful alternative.

                                    E 1 Reply Last reply
                                    1
                                    • GloomyG Gloomy

                                      That logic falls apart real fast. Hitting children, for example. Legal, but is it right?

                                      Some places have legal laws that are horrifying. You can see the other implementation of your logic there. Like, is being gay a bad thing, as long as it is illegal?

                                      BlackLaZoRB This user is from outside of this forum
                                      BlackLaZoRB This user is from outside of this forum
                                      BlackLaZoR
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #154

                                      I have no obligation to follow your moral compass - which is nothing more than your opinion. The only common denominator binding both of us, is codified law.

                                      GloomyG 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • BlackLaZoRB BlackLaZoR

                                        I have no obligation to follow your moral compass - which is nothing more than your opinion. The only common denominator binding both of us, is codified law.

                                        GloomyG This user is from outside of this forum
                                        GloomyG This user is from outside of this forum
                                        Gloomy
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #155

                                        Ah, the german approach (used mainly between 1934 and 1945) πŸ˜‰

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • π™²πš‘πšŠπš’πš›πš–πšŠπš— π™ΌπšŽπš˜πš C π™²πš‘πšŠπš’πš›πš–πšŠπš— π™ΌπšŽπš˜πš 

                                          The inability to distinguish between selection and socialization means there’s no evidence for a causal link. At best, it suggests that people who commit sexual aggression generally like porn featuring it more, but even that is apparently a weak correlation apparently.

                                          GloomyG This user is from outside of this forum
                                          GloomyG This user is from outside of this forum
                                          Gloomy
                                          wrote on last edited by gloomy@mander.xyz
                                          #156

                                          I don’t disagree. It also doesn’t prove your point though, so we are back to square one.

                                          Maybe this is of some relevance for us, i came across it in another discussion a while back.

                                          It’s a study that looks at CFSM (Child fantasy sexual material) and tries to determine, if it makes pedophiles more or less likley to assault children in real life.

                                          Unfortunately they arrive at the conclusion, that we don’t have enoth studys to know yet. I would assume the same to be true for violent porn and rl sexual assault. But i am happy to be corrected, if you have the data to back it up.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0

                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          • First post
                                            Last post