Skip to content
0
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Sketchy)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Wandering Adventure Party

  1. Home
  2. RPGMemes
  3. Dual Wielding [Dungeons & Dragons]

Dual Wielding [Dungeons & Dragons]

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved RPGMemes
rpgmemes
89 Posts 47 Posters 3 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • tetragrade@leminal.spaceT tetragrade@leminal.space

    The whole basis of this (nonsense) argument, and related ones, is that “weapon” is defined as “one of the entries in the ‘weapons’ table in the DMG”, rather than y’know, the normal meaning of the word. But there is zero indication that this’d be the case, it’s just powergaming chudslop.

    Treantmonk has been a disaster for tbe 5e community.

    I This user is from outside of this forum
    I This user is from outside of this forum
    ironbird@lemmy.world
    wrote last edited by
    #80

    5e is the disaster

    1 Reply Last reply
    4
    • I ilinamorato@lemmy.world

      I’m not trying to sell you on class-based RPGs if that’s not your thing. I’m just saying that I think your particular problem as stated is more about the style of the specific table than of the specific system (though in fairness I agree that the system isn’t helping you much). Do you like classless games better, or are you more in the “just write a book” camp?

      HossenfefferH This user is from outside of this forum
      HossenfefferH This user is from outside of this forum
      Hossenfeffer
      wrote last edited by hossenfeffer@feddit.uk
      #81

      I enjoy classless. I started on Red Box D&D back in 1982 (I think) and it was an absolute revelation for me and a foundational moment for my entire life’s ‘hobby’ compared to the computer adventure games I’d played up until that point (The Hobbit, Colossal Cave, Zork, etc). But a few short years after that I was introduced to Runequest and D&D just seemed like a child’s game in comparison. Again, I want to make it clear I’m not dismissing anyone else’s game. If D&D is your one true love then that’s awesome and I’m glad you love it and hope you have many, many more years of gaming enjoyment.

      But I, personally, found the class system and the level system just too artificial and not reflective of living, breathing characters. It felt (to me) like a cartoon version of role-playing compared to Runequest where PCs were deeply, and fundamentally, embedded in the game world, and the limitations on them were in-game, world-based limitations, rather than game system limitations which were not a natural outcome of the world, but of the arbitrary decisions of the game designers. I’m thinking ‘woshippers of Humakt (the RQ god of Death) can’t kill people who surrender’ vs. ‘magic users can’t wear armor’ kind of limitations.

      I want to stress, once again, I’m not trying to shit on any one else’s game fun. The more people playing TTRPGs the better as far as I’m concerned.

      I 1 Reply Last reply
      1
      • tgirlschierkeT tgirlschierke
        This post did not contain any content.
        Link Preview Image
        A This user is from outside of this forum
        A This user is from outside of this forum
        agent641@lemmy.world
        wrote last edited by
        #82

        Can you play as a creature with four arms?

        JackbyDevJ 1 Reply Last reply
        3
        • tgirlschierkeT tgirlschierke
          This post did not contain any content.
          Link Preview Image
          JackbyDevJ This user is from outside of this forum
          JackbyDevJ This user is from outside of this forum
          JackbyDev
          wrote last edited by
          #83

          Is a fist considered a light weapon? Hmmm

          1 Reply Last reply
          1
          • A agent641@lemmy.world

            Can you play as a creature with four arms?

            JackbyDevJ This user is from outside of this forum
            JackbyDevJ This user is from outside of this forum
            JackbyDev
            wrote last edited by
            #84

            Loxodons (Elephant species) have two arms but can use their trunk to make a grapple attack.

            N 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • C Cethin

              It’s too many rules written with too much haste and no testing. You end up with a ton of rules that aren’t clear and contradict each other constantly. It’s honestly a shit system. New players really should be told to play Pathfinder 2e at this point, not D&D5e. If the company being complete shit wasn’t enough of a reason, the rules making a lot more sense should be.

              J This user is from outside of this forum
              J This user is from outside of this forum
              jtrek@startrek.website
              wrote last edited by
              #85

              New players really should be told to play Pathfinder 2e at this point, not D&D5e

              It’s unfortunate that DND 5e is the sole mega popular game.

              People who want fantasy tactical combat would probably do well with Pathfinder 2e. But people who just want to tell a fun story would probably have a lot more fun with something lighter, like Fate.

              There’s so many games out there and most don’t get the love they deserve

              1 Reply Last reply
              3
              • M Melmi

                Do you know where it says you can’t unarmed strike while holding a two handed weapon? I’m not seeing a requirement for a free hand in the rules.

                F This user is from outside of this forum
                F This user is from outside of this forum
                Fushuan [he/him]
                wrote last edited by fushuan@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                #86

                I got lost in the reeds, I though we were talking about bonus action unarmed attacks, which, for doing a bonus action attack you need a light weapon and only monks consider unarmed attacks “light” for the purposes of bonus action attacks. So yeah, fighters RAW can’t bonus action unarmed strike with their “offhand” because they don’t consider their first/feet light weapons.

                In any case, you are right, anyone should be able to use their whole action to kick someone even if they are wielding a 2hander, but only monks can do it as a bonus action effectively, if they are using versatile monk weapons like quarterstaves.

                I know you wanted for references, but since I changed my argument you might not need them anymore. If you want I can search proper references.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • JackbyDevJ JackbyDev

                  Loxodons (Elephant species) have two arms but can use their trunk to make a grapple attack.

                  N This user is from outside of this forum
                  N This user is from outside of this forum
                  nycto@lemmy.world
                  wrote last edited by nycto@lemmy.world
                  #87

                  Thikreen have 4 arms. The secondary set can use Light weapons. Note that having 4 arms, each holding a Dagger or other light weapon doesn’t inherently grant any additional attacks.

                  The best combo I have come up with is using 5.5 weapon mastery ruleson a Berserker Barb, and a 2h weapon with some desirable property like Cleave in your Primary arms, and Scimitars in your secondary arms. After level 5, with attack action you can make 1 attack with your big weapon, Cleave attack if you hit, then 1 attack with the secondary arms Scimitar, then an attack from Nick as part of that same attack action, then a bonus action attack with scimitar. STR bonus on first 2 attacks, +2 Rage bonus on all 5 attacks, +2d6 damage on first hit when Reckless, which you should always use.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  1
                  • owenfromcanada@lemmy.caO owenfromcanada@lemmy.ca

                    There are three things in the rules that I’m aware of that talk about fighting with two weapons:

                    1. There is a subsection in the basic rules called Two-Weapon Fighting. These are the base rules for anyone using two weapons (BA attack without ability modifier, must use light weapons)
                    2. There is also a fighting style called Two-Weapon Fighting available to fighters and a couple of specific subclasses (Swashbuckler has that option, I think). This fighting style allows you to add your ability modifier to the off-hand attack.
                    3. There is a feat called Dual Wielding (Player’s Handbook) that grants additional bonuses: the weapons don’t have to be light, a +1 AC bonus, and you’re able to draw or stow both weapons at once.
                    J This user is from outside of this forum
                    J This user is from outside of this forum
                    jeeve65@ttrpg.network
                    wrote last edited by
                    #88

                    That is true, for the 2014 (5e) version

                    The 2024 / 5.5e version rules no longer have the “two-weapon fighting” subsection - the rule is now merged into the description of the ‘light’ weapon property

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • HossenfefferH Hossenfeffer

                      I enjoy classless. I started on Red Box D&D back in 1982 (I think) and it was an absolute revelation for me and a foundational moment for my entire life’s ‘hobby’ compared to the computer adventure games I’d played up until that point (The Hobbit, Colossal Cave, Zork, etc). But a few short years after that I was introduced to Runequest and D&D just seemed like a child’s game in comparison. Again, I want to make it clear I’m not dismissing anyone else’s game. If D&D is your one true love then that’s awesome and I’m glad you love it and hope you have many, many more years of gaming enjoyment.

                      But I, personally, found the class system and the level system just too artificial and not reflective of living, breathing characters. It felt (to me) like a cartoon version of role-playing compared to Runequest where PCs were deeply, and fundamentally, embedded in the game world, and the limitations on them were in-game, world-based limitations, rather than game system limitations which were not a natural outcome of the world, but of the arbitrary decisions of the game designers. I’m thinking ‘woshippers of Humakt (the RQ god of Death) can’t kill people who surrender’ vs. ‘magic users can’t wear armor’ kind of limitations.

                      I want to stress, once again, I’m not trying to shit on any one else’s game fun. The more people playing TTRPGs the better as far as I’m concerned.

                      I This user is from outside of this forum
                      I This user is from outside of this forum
                      ilinamorato@lemmy.world
                      wrote last edited by
                      #89

                      I haven’t played Runequest. It’s been on the list for ages, though.

                      I’m actually not even that big a fan of D&D specifically; most of my recent games have been PF2e, which has a lot more of a LEGO set feel with how you build characters and I think can avoid some of the issues you’re talking about. But I’m always up for trying new systems when I get the chance. In fairness, that’s rare.

                      With you 100% on that last line.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      1

                      Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                      Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                      With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                      Register Login
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Login or register to search.
                      Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                      • First post
                        Last post