Skip to content
0
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Sketchy)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Wandering Adventure Party

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. #QuestionOfTheDay What's something (a trope, plot point, character type, twist, technology, magic, decision, conceit of the genre/world, whatever) in fiction that you just can't buy.

#QuestionOfTheDay What's something (a trope, plot point, character type, twist, technology, magic, decision, conceit of the genre/world, whatever) in fiction that you just can't buy.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
questionofthedafictiontelevisionmangaanimefilmmoviesbooksccgs
51 Posts 16 Posters 2 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • NazoN Nazo

    @MorningSong @ami_angelwings The Holodeck at least made sense. It had safety mechanisms to keep what happened from actually killing a person. But if the safeties go off, then it would affect you via normal physics or whatever.

    But the other things... Yeah, they just have to tack something on. Like for dying in VR to make sense the system itself has to shock your heart into stopping or something on purpose. That's not even a mechanism that makes sense... For the Matrix to kill a person it has to actually kill their body separately on principle... (That one bothered me especially because they were supposed to be using it as a system of supposedly getting power from people in the system. By letting people die the Matrix was decreasing power capabilities...)

    Ami AngelwingsA This user is from outside of this forum
    Ami AngelwingsA This user is from outside of this forum
    Ami Angelwings
    wrote last edited by
    #39

    @nazokiyoubinbou @MorningSong when I first saw the matrix and they said if you die in the matrix you die in real life I was like that doesn't make sense, and I really really thought the ending would be that Neo realizes it doesn't make sense and that's how he survives death by not believing in it, mind you I also thought he would basically just live as a consciousness in the Matrix without need for a body at the end

    NazoN Morning SongM 2 Replies Last reply
    0
    • Ami AngelwingsA Ami Angelwings

      #QuestionOfTheDay What's something (a trope, plot point, character type, twist, technology, magic, decision, conceit of the genre/world, whatever) in fiction that you just can't buy.

      i.e. you get that it's fiction, & that it's a thing that happens, or that in the fictional world it's accepted, justified, or explained, or fans love it, etc. It's not that you don't understand it, it's just that you don't buy it, it doesn't work for you, you just can't accept it or take it seriously, etc...

      This is a judgement free zone (at least from my end) so if you're like "when space magic shows up I can't take it seriously" or "ppl being able to fly makes no sense to me" etc that's totally fine.

      #fiction #Television #TV #manga #anime #film #movies #books #CCGs #ttrpg #videogames #comics #comicbooks

      Martha CrimsonM This user is from outside of this forum
      Martha CrimsonM This user is from outside of this forum
      Martha Crimson
      wrote last edited by
      #40

      @ami_angelwings
      Women looking at their newborn squeeling
      "He's beautiful!"

      Having been through the experience I can say the tiny person is very loveable, but you are tired, sore, and the baby is blueish and covered in slime. Beautiful is _not_ the word.

      Also, that the mom usually dies minutes after saying that line makes it even worse.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • NazoN Nazo

        @MorningSong @ami_angelwings The Holodeck at least made sense. It had safety mechanisms to keep what happened from actually killing a person. But if the safeties go off, then it would affect you via normal physics or whatever.

        But the other things... Yeah, they just have to tack something on. Like for dying in VR to make sense the system itself has to shock your heart into stopping or something on purpose. That's not even a mechanism that makes sense... For the Matrix to kill a person it has to actually kill their body separately on principle... (That one bothered me especially because they were supposed to be using it as a system of supposedly getting power from people in the system. By letting people die the Matrix was decreasing power capabilities...)

        Morning SongM This user is from outside of this forum
        Morning SongM This user is from outside of this forum
        Morning Song
        wrote last edited by
        #41

        @nazokiyoubinbou @ami_angelwings Yeah, there's a reasonable watsonian explanation for holodeck malfunctions, but a well-reasoned plot isn't a *good* plot, and it means that with like... three exceptions i can think of over the entire 90s trek era, every holodeck malfunction episode is basically exactly the same.

        NazoN 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • Ami AngelwingsA Ami Angelwings

          @nazokiyoubinbou @bikubi I like the next generation episode "The Next Phase" because it's a great character episode about Geordi and Ro, but nothing about it made any sense to me, even as a child, I was like how do they breathe! why aren't they falling through the floor? shouldn't they just phase through everything and be left behind by the Enterprise as it flies around?

          kubiB This user is from outside of this forum
          kubiB This user is from outside of this forum
          kubi
          wrote last edited by
          #42

          @ami_angelwings @nazokiyoubinbou it's like the sheer amount of obvious surface impossibilities has my brain idle at like 30%... leaves only 35% for each ro and geordie

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • kubiB kubi

            @estelle @ami_angelwings wait, who? whose muons?
            but yes, sounds plausible 🤔

            estelleE This user is from outside of this forum
            estelleE This user is from outside of this forum
            estelle
            wrote last edited by
            #43

            @bikubi @ami_angelwings negative charge like electron but beeg (so it sits closer to the nucleus)

            but also extremely prone to decay, so...

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • Ami AngelwingsA Ami Angelwings

              @nazokiyoubinbou @MorningSong when I first saw the matrix and they said if you die in the matrix you die in real life I was like that doesn't make sense, and I really really thought the ending would be that Neo realizes it doesn't make sense and that's how he survives death by not believing in it, mind you I also thought he would basically just live as a consciousness in the Matrix without need for a body at the end

              NazoN This user is from outside of this forum
              NazoN This user is from outside of this forum
              Nazo
              wrote last edited by
              #44

              @ami_angelwings @MorningSong Honestly the whole thing is crazy silly. It would make a lot more sense just to setup chemical pools or something to do the same stuff human bodies do if it came to that, but putting that aside, why do a whole big fake world? Just trap people's minds in some looping trippy thing so they never really know what's going on and they would never even learn enough from birth to even think "is reality even real?"

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • Morning SongM Morning Song

                @nazokiyoubinbou @ami_angelwings Yeah, there's a reasonable watsonian explanation for holodeck malfunctions, but a well-reasoned plot isn't a *good* plot, and it means that with like... three exceptions i can think of over the entire 90s trek era, every holodeck malfunction episode is basically exactly the same.

                NazoN This user is from outside of this forum
                NazoN This user is from outside of this forum
                Nazo
                wrote last edited by
                #45

                @MorningSong @ami_angelwings They definitely overutilized the idea way too much, I'll agree with that. It never should have even become a trope in the first place... Just like a one-off.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • Ami AngelwingsA Ami Angelwings

                  @nazokiyoubinbou @MorningSong when I first saw the matrix and they said if you die in the matrix you die in real life I was like that doesn't make sense, and I really really thought the ending would be that Neo realizes it doesn't make sense and that's how he survives death by not believing in it, mind you I also thought he would basically just live as a consciousness in the Matrix without need for a body at the end

                  Morning SongM This user is from outside of this forum
                  Morning SongM This user is from outside of this forum
                  Morning Song
                  wrote last edited by
                  #46

                  @ami_angelwings @nazokiyoubinbou So I know people defend the Matrix sequels on a number of principles, but they're just so unsatisfying from a worldbuilding perspective and also like, looking on from 25 years later, the ending is so unsatisfying. The humans traded their one bargaining chip for a chance at a peace that can easily be unilateraly broken by the machines at any time.

                  Ami AngelwingsA 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • NazoN Nazo

                    @5easypieces @ami_angelwings Banking would be possible with compensating lateral thrusters though. That's already a thing in modern ships. The real issue there is the mechanism of somehow compensating so people standing up or not strapped down thoroughly don't go flying against the walls. Star Trek definitely didn't care.

                    I don't know about shields. I've seen some things talk about concepts like really powerful electromagnetic fields being utilized and theoretically that could do somewhat maybe, possibly. Or other ideas like manipulating some actual physical material? Definite scifi trope, but maybe not impossible.

                    Having an alarm system does make sense though and red would definitely be the critical alarm color. That's pretty much a non-scifi thing.

                    Koven!5 This user is from outside of this forum
                    Koven!5 This user is from outside of this forum
                    Koven!
                    wrote last edited by
                    #47

                    @nazokiyoubinbou @ami_angelwings To be clear, I've got no problems with red alerts. We should have alerts and they should be red.

                    It is just funny to me that in scifi, shields just kind of...exist. We have collectively decided that if you have a spacecraft, that spacecraft will have shields. That repel particles and energy. That can be "weakened" somehow by repeated pummeling by said particles and energy.

                    I'm okay with Uhura falling towards the turbolift, but shields? Impossible! 🙂

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • Cassandra Granade 🏳️‍⚧️X Cassandra Granade 🏳️‍⚧️

                      @ami_angelwings Time travel models that don't at least try to answer the question of "why not go back in time again and fix your previous time travel fuckup?" Whenever I replay Chrono Trigger, I just want to go back to an earlier point in one of the eras and un-do something.

                      There's so many ways of addressing that, like Link Click handles it by having the concept of an "anchor," or there's other stories that just run with "yep, you can!" It's always weird when that question is left hanging.

                      Morning SongM This user is from outside of this forum
                      Morning SongM This user is from outside of this forum
                      Morning Song
                      wrote last edited by
                      #48

                      @xgranade I agree with this and also I hate when they have "band-aid" rules totally disconnected from the rest of the time travel mechanics to stop it (c.f. the Rose's Dad ep from the first revived Doctor Who season)

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • Morning SongM Morning Song

                        @ami_angelwings @nazokiyoubinbou So I know people defend the Matrix sequels on a number of principles, but they're just so unsatisfying from a worldbuilding perspective and also like, looking on from 25 years later, the ending is so unsatisfying. The humans traded their one bargaining chip for a chance at a peace that can easily be unilateraly broken by the machines at any time.

                        Ami AngelwingsA This user is from outside of this forum
                        Ami AngelwingsA This user is from outside of this forum
                        Ami Angelwings
                        wrote last edited by
                        #49

                        @MorningSong @nazokiyoubinbou I defend nothing, not the Matrix sequels, not the Star Wars prequels, if it's bad it's bad and I'm not going to spend brain energy trying to rehabilitate them just because they're in a franchise I liked the original things in

                        Like I always say when people constantly revisit the prequels to find new meaning in them or talk about the newest mid Star Wars thing and how actually...

                        "Would we be spending this much energy trying to justify how it all makes sense if it wasn't named Star Wars?"

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • Ami AngelwingsA Ami Angelwings

                          @xerozohar I liked that they kept Thomas Riker, that was fresh to me, but I hated that they didn't do anything with him but bring him back for one ratings baiting early season DS9 episode (they even advertised it as Riker guest stars in DS9) and then have him just be thrown in a Cardassian gulag somewhere forever I guess

                          🤖Robot Enby Xero🤖X This user is from outside of this forum
                          🤖Robot Enby Xero🤖X This user is from outside of this forum
                          🤖Robot Enby Xero🤖
                          wrote last edited by
                          #50

                          @ami_angelwings Exactly! There is so much they could have done with that. But noooooo

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • Ami AngelwingsA Ami Angelwings

                            #QuestionOfTheDay What's something (a trope, plot point, character type, twist, technology, magic, decision, conceit of the genre/world, whatever) in fiction that you just can't buy.

                            i.e. you get that it's fiction, & that it's a thing that happens, or that in the fictional world it's accepted, justified, or explained, or fans love it, etc. It's not that you don't understand it, it's just that you don't buy it, it doesn't work for you, you just can't accept it or take it seriously, etc...

                            This is a judgement free zone (at least from my end) so if you're like "when space magic shows up I can't take it seriously" or "ppl being able to fly makes no sense to me" etc that's totally fine.

                            #fiction #Television #TV #manga #anime #film #movies #books #CCGs #ttrpg #videogames #comics #comicbooks

                            SilverGMS This user is from outside of this forum
                            SilverGMS This user is from outside of this forum
                            SilverGM
                            wrote last edited by
                            #51

                            @ami_angelwings Two people that hate eachother ending up falling in love.
                            There are some situations or variations where it makes sense, but often it's like "This person is so annoying! Oops, now I'm in love!" Which just doesn't make sense to me. People who are annoying don't become attractive.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0

                            Reply
                            • Reply as topic
                            Log in to reply
                            • Oldest to Newest
                            • Newest to Oldest
                            • Most Votes


                            • Login

                            • Login or register to search.
                            Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                            • First post
                              Last post