Fate’s solution to this is so good. It’s so nice not to leave to chance the important binding glue of the party, while still making it part of gameplay. I use Fate’s character/ party rules as house rules for every game system I GM.

that looks fun to play

Good point.

Back in the 80s we were just guessing most of the time. At least until Akira was released in the United States in 1988 and only then white people started realizing there was a market.

Redo of Healer posting

Not my little pony: friendship is magic? Edit: after scrolling down, others got to it first.

Emphasis on the “pal.”

What is the movie?

This post did not contain any content.

Looks at the Hunter: The Reckoning first edition books that are well worn at this point. “Well shit.”

My old DM said explicitly if he told us the monster’s name in the MM he expected us to know it’s stats, if he didn’t then statblocks would be unreliable.

Oh it’s okay I don’t need cyan ::: spoiler reference? Lol [image: 486d39c5-4bcc-4d02-845d-331c56c971bd.jpeg] :::

When the dragon’s away, the kobolds will play!

I dunno dude, I disagree with you and seemingly a great deal of other people do too, but you are absolutely entitled to your opinion. No need to insult me to make your point.

Immovable Rod is definitely the name of the bouncer at my next tavern

I cast inflict wounds with my axe

Yeah, I didn’t read the text on the page, only the title.

So a bag that’s bigger on the inside but doesn’t link to a pocket dimension. You could also go with the items being shrunken while inside, in that Ant-Man-ish “the space between the particles is reduced, and all mass is retained” way. If the bag breaks, the items revert to normal size.

It adjusts the depth map where you walk to appear as though something footprint-shaoed has sunk into the floor, as if in thick mud. Regardless of the surface - stone? still looks like someone sank into it a bit. When they run their hand over it, the floor is actually smooth as if nothing had happened, but the depth map makes it look like it.

Maybe so, and maybe I’m interpreting Coopr wrong. But on the quality of the image itself… it’s not much of a meme in my eyes. It’s a relatively simple character, the only goofy thing about them is that they’re a frog. The caption doesn’t make a whole lot of sense, and neither the caption, character, or scenery seems to relate to each other. Maybe I’m just unfamiliar with “modern humor” (so to speak) but I just don’t get it.